Paving the way for autonomous Vehicles: Understanding autonomous vehicle adoption and vehicle fuel choice under user heterogeneity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Peeta,et al. Safety and health perceptions of location-based augmented reality gaming app and their implications. , 2021, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[2] S. Labi,et al. Understanding electric bike riders’ intention to violate traffic rules and accident proneness in China , 2021 .
[3] Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al. China’s millennial car travelers’ mode shift responses under congestion pricing and reward policies: A case study in Beijing , 2021 .
[4] David T. Ma,et al. Exploring the impacts of travel-implied policy factors on COVID-19 spread within communities based on multi-source data interpretations , 2021, Health & Place.
[5] S. Peeta,et al. Impacts of Pokémon GO on route and mode choice decisions: exploring the potential for integrating augmented reality, gamification, and social components in mobile apps to influence travel decisions , 2021, Transportation.
[6] Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al. Promise of the obsolete: expectations for and experiments with self-driving vehicles in Norway , 2020, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy.
[7] Erik Stayton,et al. It’s Time to Rethink Levels of Automation for Self-Driving Vehicles , 2020, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..
[8] Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al. Personal and societal impacts of motorcycle ban policy on motorcyclists’ home-to-work morning commute in China , 2020, Travel Behaviour and Society.
[9] S. Peeta,et al. Impacts of personalized accessibility information on residential location choice and travel behavior , 2020, Travel Behaviour and Society.
[10] Emmanouil Chaniotakis,et al. Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[11] N. Marres. Co-existence or displacement: Do street trials of intelligent vehicles test society? , 2020, The British journal of sociology.
[12] Marianne Ryghaug,et al. The role of practical, cognitive and symbolic factors in the successful implementation of battery electric vehicles in Norway , 2019 .
[13] Ching-Fu Chen. Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: Evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[14] Daeho Lee,et al. Autonomous vehicles can be shared, but a feeling of ownership is important: Examination of the influential factors for intention to use autonomous vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[15] R. Bennett,et al. Attitudes towards autonomous vehicles among people with physical disabilities , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[16] Alfred Benedikt Brendel,et al. Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[17] Joanne M. Bennett,et al. To buy or not to buy? Predicting willingness to pay for automated vehicles based on public opinion , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[18] Jinhuan Zhao,et al. Risk preference and adoption of autonomous vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[19] Jan C Zoellick,et al. Amused, accepted, and used? Attitudes and emotions towards automated vehicles, their relationships, and predictive value for usage intention , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[20] Na Du,et al. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming , 2019, Hum. Factors.
[21] S. Peeta,et al. Impacts of congestion pricing and reward strategies on automobile travelers’ morning commute mode shift decisions , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[22] Anand R. Gopal,et al. Describing the users: Understanding adoption of and interest in shared, electrified, and automated transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[23] Rosaria M Berliner,et al. Who will be the early adopters of automated vehicles? Insights from a survey of electric vehicle owners in the United States , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[24] Jingzheng Ren,et al. Pleasure or profit? Surveying the purchasing intentions of potential electric vehicle adopters in China , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[25] Xian Xu,et al. Autonomous vehicles, risk perceptions and insurance demand: An individual survey in China , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[26] Qiang Meng,et al. Designing autonomous vehicle incentive program with uncertain vehicle purchase price , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[27] Jacob Haspiel,et al. Look Who's Talking Now: Implications of AV's Explanations on Driver's Trust, AV Preference, Anxiety and Mental Workload , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[28] Sanya Carley,et al. Evolution of plug-in electric vehicle demand: Assessing consumer perceptions and intent to purchase over time , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[29] Ransford A. Acheampong,et al. Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[30] José M. Grisolía,et al. The impact of service and government-policy attributes on consumer preferences for electric vehicles in China , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[31] Jinhua Zhao,et al. Rider-to-rider discriminatory attitudes and ridesharing behavior , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[32] Parvathy Vinod Sheela,et al. The effect of information on changing opinions toward autonomous vehicle adoption: An exploratory analysis , 2019, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.
[33] Peng Liu,et al. Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[34] B. Ran,et al. Exploring the Factors Affecting Mode Choice Intention of Autonomous Vehicle Based on an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior—A Case Study in China , 2019, Sustainability.
[35] Shunsuke Managi,et al. Effect of environmental awareness on purchase intention and satisfaction pertaining to electric vehicles in Japan , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[36] Bing Wu,et al. Impacts of information from various sources on the evacuation decision-making process during no-notice evacuations in campus environment , 2019, Journal of Transportation Safety & Security.
[37] Khandker Nurul Habib,et al. Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution , 2019 .
[38] Christos Gkartzonikas,et al. What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[39] Rosaria M Berliner,et al. Uncovering early adopter’s perceptions and purchase intentions of automated vehicles: Insights from early adopters of electric vehicles in California , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[40] Sanya Carley,et al. All plug-in electric vehicles are not the same: Predictors of preference for a plug-in hybrid versus a battery-electric vehicle , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[41] K. Kockelman,et al. Anticipating the Regional Impacts of Connected and Automated Vehicle Travel in Austin, Texas , 2018, Journal of Urban Planning and Development.
[42] Abolfazl Mohammadian,et al. Shared versus private mobility: Modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[43] Will Gorman,et al. Long-term U.S transportation electricity use considering the effect of autonomous-vehicles: Estimates & policy observations , 2018, Energy Policy.
[44] Srinivas Peeta,et al. Impacts of internal migration, household registration system, and family planning policy on travel mode choice in China , 2018, Travel Behaviour and Society.
[45] A. Nordlund,et al. The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, geographic setting, and attitudes for adoption of electric vehicles in Sweden , 2018, Travel Behaviour and Society.
[46] George Dimitrakopoulos,et al. An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[47] Francesco Ciari,et al. Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies , 2018, Transport Reviews.
[48] Ming Xu,et al. A Review on Energy, Environmental, and Sustainability Implications of Connected and Automated Vehicles , 2018, Environmental science & technology.
[49] Jonn Axsen,et al. The Roles of Users in Electric, Shared and Automated Mobility Transitions , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[50] Lixian Qian,et al. Consumer preferences for electric vehicles in lower tier cities of China: Evidences from south Jiangsu region , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[51] Ali Shamshiripour,et al. Eliciting preferences for adoption of fully automated vehicles using best-worst analysis , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.
[52] S. Haustein,et al. On sceptics and enthusiasts: What are the expectations towards self-driving cars? , 2018, Transport Policy.
[53] D. Jarvis,et al. Analysing the take up of battery electric vehicles: An investigation of barriers amongst drivers in the UK , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[54] Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al. Modelling service-specific and global transit satisfaction under travel and user heterogeneity , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
[55] R. Bennett,et al. An assessment of UK drivers’ attitudes regarding the forthcoming ban on the sale of petrol and diesel vehicles , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
[56] Dimitri A Christakis,et al. Are Mechanical Turk worker samples representative of health status and health behaviors in the U.S.? , 2018, PloS one.
[57] A. Pradhan,et al. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.
[58] D. Sui,et al. Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities , 2018, Cities.
[59] Joel M. Cooper,et al. Cognitive Underpinnings of Beliefs and Confidence in Beliefs about Fully Automated Vehicles , 2018 .
[60] J. D. Winter,et al. Acceptance of Driverless Vehicles: Results from a Large Cross-National Questionnaire Study , 2018 .
[61] Lewis Fulton,et al. Three Revolutions in Urban Passenger Travel , 2018 .
[62] Kanwaldeep Kaur,et al. Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars , 2018 .
[63] Elias Boutros Khalil,et al. The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation , 2018 .
[64] Julia M. Hildebrand,et al. Media Ecologies of Autonomous Automobility: Gendered and Racial Dimensions of Future Concept Cars , 2018 .
[65] Rachana Vidhi,et al. A Review of Electric Vehicle Lifecycle Emissions and Policy Recommendations to Increase EV Penetration in India , 2018 .
[66] Edwin R. Galea,et al. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age , 2018 .
[67] Will Gorman,et al. The electrification accelerator: Understanding the implications of autonomous vehicles for electric utilities , 2017 .
[68] R. Jayakrishnan,et al. Autonomous or driver-less vehicles: Implementation strategies and operational concerns , 2017 .
[69] Shanyong Wang,et al. The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China , 2017 .
[70] Felipe F. Dias,et al. Modeling Individual Preferences for Ownership and Sharing of Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2017 .
[71] Jan Karem Höhne,et al. Investigating Cognitive Effort and Response Quality of Question Formats in Web Surveys Using Paradata , 2017 .
[72] Mark E. Howard,et al. When human beings are like drunk robots: Driverless vehicles, ethics, and the future of transport , 2017 .
[73] Jacob Groshek,et al. Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign , 2017 .
[74] Nicole D. Sintov,et al. You are what you drive: Environmentalist and social innovator symbolism drives electric vehicle adoption intentions , 2017 .
[75] Yoram Shiftan,et al. User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles , 2017 .
[76] Franziska Schmalfuß,et al. Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention , 2017 .
[77] Jack Stilgoe,et al. Machine learning, social learning and the governance of self-driving cars , 2017, Social studies of science.
[78] Melanie Revilla,et al. Ideal and Maximum Length for a Web Survey , 2017, International Journal of Market Research.
[79] Ricardo A. Daziano,et al. Are Consumers Willing to Pay to Let Cars Drive for Them? Analyzing Response to Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .
[80] Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al. Attitudes Toward Autonomous on Demand Mobility System: The Case of Self-Driving Taxi , 2017, ENTER.
[81] Germán Escovar Álvarez,et al. To Share or Not to Share , 2017 .
[82] Josiah P. Hanna,et al. Operations of a Shared, Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle & Charging Infrastructure Decisions , 2016 .
[83] Isabell M. Welpe,et al. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups , 2016 .
[84] Srinivas Peeta,et al. Impacts of Property Accessibility and Neighborhood Built Environment on Single-Unit and Multiunit Residential Property Values , 2016 .
[85] Corey D. Harper,et al. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions , 2016 .
[86] Rico Krueger,et al. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .
[87] Kara M. Kockelman,et al. Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .
[88] Bart van Arem,et al. Solving the User Optimum Privately Owned Automated Vehicles Assignment Problem (UO-POAVAP): A model to explore the impacts of self-driving vehicles on urban mobility , 2016 .
[89] John D. Nelson,et al. Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness , 2016 .
[90] Markus Barth,et al. Still underdetected - social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in germany , 2016 .
[91] Yuntao Guo,et al. Rail–Truck Multimodal Freight Collaboration: Truck Freight Carrier Perspectives in the United States , 2015 .
[92] C. Bhat,et al. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for advanced vehicle technology options and fuel types , 2015 .
[93] J. Greenblatt,et al. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles , 2015 .
[94] Yong Gu Ji,et al. Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[95] D. Tingley,et al. “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents , 2015 .
[96] Riender Happee,et al. Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .
[97] Daniel J. Fagnant,et al. Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations , 2015 .
[98] P. D. Pelsmacker,et al. A Self-identity Based Model of Electric Car Adoption Intention: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study , 2015 .
[99] David J. Hauser,et al. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.
[100] Jeremy J. Michalek,et al. Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .
[101] John D. Graham,et al. Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle , 2015 .
[102] C. Klöckner,et al. A comprehensive socio-psychological approach to car type choice , 2014 .
[103] William Payre,et al. Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability , 2014 .
[104] Tom L. Roberts,et al. Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes (MIMIC) Models as a Mixed-Modelling Technique: A Tutorial and an Annotated Example , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[105] P. Plötz,et al. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany , 2014 .
[106] E. Dütschke,et al. How do Consumers Perceive Electric Vehicles? A Comparison of German Consumer Groups , 2014 .
[107] Joseph S. Krupa,et al. Analysis of a consumer survey on plug-in hybrid electric vehicles , 2014 .
[108] Elisabetta Cherchi,et al. A long panel survey to elicit variation in preferences and attitudes in the choice of electric vehicles , 2014 .
[109] Yves Rosseel,et al. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .
[110] Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al. Generalizations on Consumer Innovation Adoption: A Meta-Analysis on Drivers of Intention and Behavior , 2011 .
[111] M. Dodgson,et al. Adopting and consuming innovations , 2010 .
[112] Detmar W. Straub,et al. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..
[113] Gordon C. Bruner,et al. Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology , 2007 .
[114] James A. Bovaird,et al. Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation With Contextual Factors , 2007 .
[115] Elena Karahanna,et al. Reconceptualizing Compatability Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research , 2006, MIS Q..
[116] G. Roehrich. Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements , 2004 .
[117] M. Skubic,et al. Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of ‘smart home’ technologies: a pilot study , 2004, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.
[118] Anol Bhattacherjee,et al. Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..
[119] Thomas F. Golob,et al. Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research , 2001 .
[120] G. Ewing,et al. Assessing Consumer Preferences for Clean-Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2000 .
[121] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[122] H. Hurt,et al. SCALES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF INNOVATIVENESS , 1977 .
[123] S. Rouse. Reliability of MTurk Data From Masters and Workers , 2020 .
[124] Ö. Şimşekoğlu,et al. Predictors of intention to buy a battery electric vehicle among conventional car drivers , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.
[125] F. Sprei. Disrupting mobility , 2018 .
[126] Joshua Auld,et al. Impact of Privately-Owned Level 4 CAV Technologies on Travel Demand and Energy , 2018, ANT/SEIT.
[127] Yuntao Guo,et al. The impact of walkable environment on single-family residential property values , 2017 .
[128] M. König,et al. Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car , 2017 .
[129] K. Kockelman,et al. Forecasting Americans' Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies , 2016 .
[130] Nick Hounsell,et al. Public Views towards Implementation of Automated Vehicles in Urban Areas , 2016 .
[131] Romeo Danielis,et al. Simulating the market penetration of cars with alternative fuelpowertrain technologies in Italy , 2015 .
[132] Prem Chand Devarasetty,et al. Can psychological variables help predict the use of priced managed lanes , 2014 .
[133] Michael R. Mullen,et al. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .
[134] P. Bentler,et al. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .
[135] R. Bagozzi,et al. On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .