Rethinking Data Fusion-Based Services in Tiered Sensor Networks

Tiered sensor network architectures are gaining currency. In contrast with flat networks of impoverished nodes (the hitherto common assumption in sensor networking), such systems offer the promise of migrating computational load from sensing nodes to higher capability ‘master’ nodes. We argue that for certain data fusion-based services this means that compute intensive algorithms, often shunned as impractical for sensor networks, are in fact a viable possibility. Using localization as an example, we show how accurate results may be obtained by leveraging this capability without the use of specialized hardware or high configuration detail; both of which are standard approaches to the problem when computation is at a premium. Specifically, we propose a mathematical optimization-based framework for localization based on proximity constraints. Most variants of localization can be cast into this framework depending on the kinds of input available (e.g. ranging). We show accurate results, and exploit a technique from distributed optimization to divide the problem into pieces suitable for computation at the master-level nodes. We conclude with remarks on the general implications of this example for tiered systems, with pointers on how it is likely to be applicable to other problems such as power-aware routing.

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Tenet: An Architecture for Tiered Embedded Networks , 2005 .

[2]  John Anderson,et al.  An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application , 2004, SenSys '04.

[3]  Tian He,et al.  A high-accuracy, low-cost localization system for wireless sensor networks , 2005, SenSys '05.

[4]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  A Hypergraph Framework for Optimal Model-Based Decomposition of Design Problems , 1997, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[5]  Joongseok Park,et al.  Maximum Lifetime Routing In Wireless Sensor Networks ∗ , 2005 .

[6]  Suresh Singh,et al.  Exploiting heterogeneity in sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[7]  David C. Moore,et al.  Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements , 2004, SenSys '04.

[8]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Habitat monitoring: application driver for wireless communications technology , 2001, CCRV.

[9]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Self-configuring localization systems: Design and Experimental Evaluation , 2004, TECS.

[11]  Miklós Maróti,et al.  Radio interferometric geolocation , 2005, SenSys '05.

[12]  Devadatta M. Kulkarni,et al.  Hierarchical overlapping coordination for large-scale optimization by decomposition , 1999 .

[13]  Krishna M. Sivalingam,et al.  A Survey of Energy Efficient Network Protocols for Wireless Networks , 2001, Wirel. Networks.