Anticipation of Time Spans: New Data from the Foreperiod Paradigm and the Adaptation of a Computational Model

To act successfully, it is necessary to adjust the timing of one's behavior to events in the environment. One way to examine human timing is the foreperiod paradigm. It requires experimental participants to react to events that occur at more or less unpredictable time points after a warning stimulus (foreperiod). In the current article, we first review the empirical and theoretical literature on the foreperiod paradigm briefly. Second, we examine how behavior depends on either a uniform or peaked (at 500ms) probability distribution of many (15) possible foreperiods. We report adaptation to different probability distribution with a pronounced adaptation for the peaked (more predictable) distribution. Third, we show that Los and colleagues' [1] computational model accounts for our results. A discussion of specific findings and general implications concludes the paper.

[1]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[2]  D H DRAZIN,et al.  Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Wearden,et al.  Scalar Properties in Human Timing: Conformity and Violations , 2006 .

[4]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[5]  E. A. Thomas Reaction-time studies: the anticipation and interaction of responses. , 1967, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[6]  R Näätänen,et al.  The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. , 1970, Acta psychologica.

[7]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  P. J. Foley The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[9]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[10]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[11]  H. Woodrow The measurement of attention , 1914 .

[12]  J J Higa,et al.  Multiple time scales in simple habituation. , 1996, Psychological review.

[13]  S. Los,et al.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Frank Agter,et al.  Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: Segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  T. Schubert,et al.  Accessory stimuli modulate effects of nonconscious priming , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning , 1989, Neural Networks.

[17]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  Impact of contingency manipulations on accessory stimulus effects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  Dynamics of a Classical Conditioning Model , 1998, Auton. Robots.

[19]  Alick Elithorn,et al.  Central Inhibition—Some Refractory Observations , 1955 .

[20]  Jesus Alegria Iscoa,et al.  Sequential effects of foreperiod duration: some strategical factors in tasks involving time uncertainty , 1975 .

[21]  P Bertelson,et al.  The Time-Course of Preparation with Regular and Irregular Foreperiods , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  L. Karlin Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[24]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  A. Machado Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. , 1997, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Human bisection at the geometric mean , 1991 .

[28]  S. Hackley,et al.  Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[29]  A. Nobre,et al.  The hazards of time , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  P. Killeen,et al.  A behavioral theory of timing. , 1988, Psychological review.

[31]  D. Knol,et al.  The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. , 2001, Acta psychologica.