Recognising Faces: Effects of Lighting Direction, Inversion, and Brightness Reversal

When information about three-dimensional shape obtained from shading and shadows is ambiguous, the visual system favours an interpretation of surface geometry which is consistent with illumination from above. If pictures of top-lit faces are rotated the resulting stimulus is both figurally inverted and illuminated from below. In this study the question of whether the effects of figural inversion and lighting orientation on face recognition are independent or interactive is addressed. Although there was a clear inversion effect for faces illuminated from the front and above, the inversion effect was found to be reduced or eliminated for faces illuminated from below. A strong inversion effect for photographic negatives was also found but in this case the effect was not dependent on the direction of illumination. These findings are interpreted as evidence to suggest that lighting faces from below disrupts the formation of surface-based representations of facial shape.

[1]  R. Hetherington.  The Perception of the Visual World , 1952 .

[2]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[3]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[4]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Recognition memory for photographs of faces. , 1971, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  R. Phillips.  Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative? , 1972 .

[7]  Gordon Rae.  Table of A′ , 1976 .

[8]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[9]  S M Luria,et al.  Comparison of Eye Movements over Faces in Photographic Positives and Negatives , 1978, Perception.

[10]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Memory for Faces and Schema Theory , 1980 .

[11]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Photometric Invariants Related to Solid Shape , 1980 .

[12]  Katsushi Ikeuchi,et al.  Numerical Shape from Shading and Occluding Boundaries , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Improved Methods of Estimating Shape from Shading Using the Light Source Coordinate System , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[14]  D.E. Pearson,et al.  Visual communication at very low data rates , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[16]  M C Morrone,et al.  Recognition of Positive and Negative Bandpass-Filtered Images , 1986, Perception.

[17]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Perceptual Organization and the Representation of Natural Form , 1986, Artif. Intell..

[18]  A. Pentland.  Perceptual organization and the representation of natural form , 1987 .

[19]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[20]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[21]  V. Bruce,et al.  Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[22]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[23]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[24]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Shape from shadows. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[26]  Kirk Martinez,et al.  Computer Generated Cartoons , 1990 .