Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences

Abstract. Previous studies using simple, repeating patterns have suggested that the knowledge gained in early sequence learning is not effector-specific in that it transfers to muscle groups other than those used during training. The current experiments extended these findings to transfer after extensive practice with probabilistic sequences using a task on which people fail to gain declarative knowledge of the regularity. Specifically, an alternating serial reaction time (ASRT) task was used in which predictable and unpredictable trials alternated. Participants responded for the first five sessions using their right hand, then switched to the left hand for the sixth session. Stimuli were spatial in the first experiment and nonspatial in the second. Significant near-perfect transfer of pattern knowledge was seen in both experiments, suggesting that muscle-specific information for either the fingers or the eyes cannot explain the observed learning.

[1]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences Identified with PET , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Attention and probabilistic sequence learning , 1998 .

[3]  U. Mayr,et al.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Thomas Goschke,et al.  Implicit learning of perceptual and motor sequences: Evidence for independent learning systems. , 1998 .

[5]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Effect of focal cerebellar lesions on procedural learning in the serial reaction time task , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Richard I. Ivry,et al.  Attention and structure in sequence learning. , 1990 .

[7]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[8]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Age differences in implicit learning of higher order dependencies in serial patterns. , 1997, Psychology and aging.

[9]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning , 1996 .

[10]  Tim Curran,et al.  Effects of aging on implicit sequence learning: Accounting for sequence structure and explicit knowledge , 1997, Psychological research.

[11]  D. Shanks.  IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[12]  J. H. Howard,et al.  Adult age differences in the rate of learning serial patterns: evidence from direct and indirect tests. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[13]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  M A Stadler,et al.  Implicit learning of a nonverbal sequence in younger and older adults. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Characteristics of sequential movements during early learning period in monkeys , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  Tim Curran,et al.  Attentional and Nonattentional Forms of Sequence Learning , 1993 .

[17]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[20]  D. Howard,et al.  Serial pattern learning by event observation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  R. Ivry,et al.  Can We Teach the Cerebellum New Tricks? , 2002, Science.

[23]  David A. Caulton,et al.  On the Modularity of Sequence Representation , 1995 .

[24]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  A Multinomial Model to Assess Fluency and Recollection in a Sequence Learning Task , 1997 .

[25]  D. Howard,et al.  When it does hurt to try: Adult age differences in the effects of instructions on implicit pattern learning , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  M. Ziessler.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning , 1994, Psychological research.

[27]  L. Squire,et al.  Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that. , 1980, Science.

[28]  K. Doya,et al.  Parallel Cortico-Basal Ganglia Mechanisms for Acquisition and Execution of Visuomotor SequencesA Computational Approach , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  On the development of procedural knowledge. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  F Rösler,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor representations. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[31]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[32]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[33]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Learning of sequential movements in the monkey: process of learning and retention of memory. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  A M Burton,et al.  Learning complex sequences: no role for observation? , 2001, Psychological research.

[35]  Tim Curran,et al.  Higher-Order Associative Learning in Amnesia: Evidence from the Serial Reaction Time Task , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Frensch,et al.  Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[38]  D. Howard,et al.  Age differences in learning serial patterns: direct versus indirect measures. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[39]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.