Attentional effects on sensory tuning for single-feature detection and double-feature conjunction

When humans scan their visual environment, relevant objects are selectively attended for enhanced processing. It is still unclear in what ways processing is modified by attention, and whether attentional selection operates on an individual feature (such as colour, orientation or motion) or on binding together different features. In the experiments reported in this paper, these two stages were characterized using psychophysical reverse correlation. Subjects viewed eight patches, briefly flashed and symmetrically arranged around fixation. Each patch consisted of segments that could vary in both colour and orientation. One of the patches ('target') differed from the remaining 'distractor' patches with respect to either its orientation, colour, or both (in three different experiments). Subjects were asked to detect the target patch. The stimulus was preceded by a cue. On some trials ('cued' trials), the cue informed observers that the target patch could only appear at two of the eight possible locations. On remaining ('uncued') trials, all eight positions were valid. Psychophysical reverse correlation was then applied to derive linear estimates of sensory filters for orientation only, colour only, and their conjunction. In line with the properties of single neurons in cortex, attentional cueing did not affect sensory tuning for detecting individual features. However, it affected the way in which features were subsequently (and very inefficiently) combined in a multiplicative fashion. The results are consistent with a model in which attention recalibrates internal responses to the statistics of the stimulus by having signals from different features mutually control each other through reciprocal inhibition.

[1]  J. Wolfe Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[3]  S. Treue Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Richard F Murray,et al.  Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  J A Solomon,et al.  Odd-men-out are poorly localized in brief exposures. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[8]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[9]  P. Neri Estimation of nonlinear psychophysical kernels. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[10]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  8. Extending guided search: why guided search needs a preattentive "item map" , 1996 .

[11]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  P Gouras,et al.  Color and spatial specificity of single units in Rhesus monkey foveal striate cortex. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Morgan,et al.  Contrast discrimination function: spatial cuing effects. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Vision: Coding and Efficiency , 1991 .

[15]  Richard F Murray,et al.  A linear cue combination framework for understanding selective attention. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[16]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[17]  L. Robertson Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[22]  P. Verghese Visual Search and Attention A Signal Detection Theory Approach , 2001, Neuron.

[23]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[25]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Covert attention enhances letter identification without affecting channel tuning. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[26]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[27]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  A spatially organized representation of colour in macaque cortical area V2 , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Larry N. Thibos,et al.  Validation of a clinical aberrometer , 2002 .

[29]  Carrie J. McAdams,et al.  Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Richard Durbin,et al.  The computing neuron , 1989 .

[31]  A. Ahumada Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[32]  C. R. Michael Color vision mechanisms in monkey striate cortex: simple cells with dual opponent-color receptive fields. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  F. Heitger,et al.  The functional role of contrast adaptation , 1988, Vision Research.

[34]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location , 2000, Vision Research.

[35]  H. Barlow Vision: A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects , 1991 .

[36]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[37]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[38]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[39]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Concomitant sensitivity to orientation, direction, and color of cells in layers 2, 3, and 4 of monkey striate cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[40]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[41]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex , 1989 .

[42]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[43]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[44]  P. Dodwell,et al.  A functional theory of the McCollough effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[45]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  P. L. Smith,et al.  Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[48]  J. Anthony Movshon,et al.  Linearity and gain control in V1 simple cells , 1999 .

[49]  Hong Zhou,et al.  The coding of uniform colour figures in monkey visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  K. Clark CONDITIONS FOR VERSATILE LEARNING , HELMHOLTZ ’ S UNCONSCIOUS INFERENCE , AND THE TASK OF PERCEPTION , 2002 .

[51]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: support for signal enhancement. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[52]  R. Andersen,et al.  Integration of motion and stereopsis in middle temporal cortical area of macaques , 1995, Nature.

[53]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Characterizing Neural Gain Control using Spike-triggered Covariance , 2001, NIPS.

[54]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission , 1999, Vision Research.

[58]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[59]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  The effect of spatial cues on visual sensitivity , 2004, Vision Research.

[61]  勇一 作村,et al.  Biophysics of Computation , 2001 .