Effects of Small-Group Tutoring with and without Validated Classroom Instruction on At-Risk Students' Math Problem Solving: Are Two Tiers of Prevention Better Than One?

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of small-group tutoring with and without validated classroom instruction on at-risk (AR) students' math problem solving. Stratifying within schools, 119 3(rd)-grade classes were randomly assigned to conventional or validated problem-solving instruction (Hot Math [schema-broadening instruction]). Students identified as AR (n = 243) were randomly assigned, within classroom conditions, to receive Hot Math tutoring or not. Students were tested on problem-solving and math applications measures before and after 16 weeks of intervention. Analyses of variance, which accounted for the nested structure of the data, revealed the tutored students who received validated classroom instruction achieved better than tutored students who received conventional classroom instruction (ES = 1.34). However, the advantage for tutoring over no tutoring was similar whether or not students received validated or conventional classroom instruction (ESs = 1.18 and 1.13). Tutoring, not validated classroom instruction reduced the prevalence of math difficulty. Implications for responsiveness-to-intervention prevention models and for enhancing math problem-solving instruction are discussed.

[1]  Jill L. Quilici,et al.  Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. , 1996 .

[2]  D. Geary,et al.  A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty. , 2005 .

[4]  B. Zimmerman.  Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[5]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Houghton Mifflin math , 2005 .

[8]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[9]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Teachers' Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Perspective , 1992, American Journal of Education.

[10]  E. Corte,et al.  Self-Regulation: A Characteristic and a Goal of Mathematics Education , 2000 .

[11]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Expanding Schema-Based Transfer Instruction to Help Third Graders Solve Real-Life Mathematical Problems , 2004 .

[12]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Response to Instruction as a Means of Identifying Students with Reading/Learning Disabilities , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel B. Berch,et al.  Why is math so hard for some children? : the nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities , 2007 .

[14]  R. Mayer.  Thinking, problem solving, cognition, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[15]  R. Gagne,et al.  Contributions of learning to human development. , 1968, Psychological review.

[16]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems , 2003 .

[17]  A. Vanderheyden,et al.  Quantifying Context in Assessment: Capturing the Effect of Base Rates on Teacher Referral and a Problem-Solving Model of Identification , 2005 .

[18]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities , 1998 .

[19]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Preventative Tutoring on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Third-Grade Students with Math and Reading Difficulties , 2008, Exceptional children.

[20]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Interactive Learning Environments: A New Look at Assessment and Instruction , 1992 .

[21]  A. Schoenfeld.  Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint) , 2009 .

[22]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[23]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. , 1999 .

[24]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  What is Learned in an After-School Computer Club? , 1999 .

[25]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Mathematical Thinking in Second-Grade Children with Different Forms of LD , 2000, Journal of learning disabilities.

[26]  Herbert P. Ginsburg,et al.  Cognitive Analysis of Children's Mathematics Difficulties , 1984 .

[27]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities , 2008 .

[28]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[29]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[30]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing Students' Helping Behavior during Peer-Mediated Instruction with Conceptual Mathematical Explanations , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[31]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. , 2007 .

[32]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction , 2004 .

[33]  J. Sweller,et al.  Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. , 1987 .

[34]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[35]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Effects of Mathematical Word Problem—Solving Instruction on Middle School Students with Learning Problems , 2005 .

[36]  G J Hitch,et al.  The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. , 1994, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[37]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Importance of Providing Background Information on the Structure and Scoring of Performance Assessments , 2000 .

[38]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[39]  E. Deci,et al.  The Importance of Motivation for the Future of the LD Field , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[40]  O Manor,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL DYSCALCULIA: PREVALENCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC FEATURES , 1996 .

[41]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Cognitive Arithmetic and Problem Solving , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[42]  Nancy C. Jordan,et al.  Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. , 2001 .

[43]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Schema-Based Word-Problem—Solving Instruction for Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[44]  R. Glaser.  Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge. , 1984 .

[45]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Explicitly Teaching for Transfer: Effects on Third-Grade Students' Mathematical Problem Solving. , 2003 .

[46]  R. Shalev.  Prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. , 2007 .

[47]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[48]  J. Boaler.  Encouraging the transfer of ‘school’ mathematics to the ‘real world’ through the integration of process and content, context and culture , 1993 .

[49]  R. Mayer.  Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition , 1983 .

[50]  J. Sweller,et al.  What do students learn while solving mathematics problems , 1985 .

[51]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Early Reading Instruction for Children with Reading Difficulties , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[52]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems , 2006 .

[53]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing third-grade student' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. , 2003 .

[54]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[55]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Changing assessments : alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction , 1994 .

[56]  Joseph C. Witt,et al.  A Multi-Year Evaluation of the Effects of a Response to Intervention (RTI) Model on Identification of Children for Special Education. , 2007 .

[57]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform , 1992 .