Technological collaboration in product innovation: The role of market competition and sectoral technological intensity

Drawing on the strategic alliances and innovation literature, this study proposes that the impact of technological collaboration on product innovation is contingent on market competition and sectoral technology characteristics. Specifically, it argues that the generally observed positive effect of technological collaboration on product innovation may be diluted in highly competitive markets, and the interactive effect of technological collaboration and market competition on product innovation will be further moderated by sectoral technological intensity. Data on the product innovation and technological collaboration of 944 Chinese firms across five manufacturing sectors provide robust support for the contingent effects of technological collaboration on product innovation.

[1]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[3]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities , 1997 .

[4]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[5]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Why do firms cooperate on R&D? an empirical study , 1992 .

[6]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[7]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Alliance Portfolios and Patent Output: The Case of Biotechnology Alliances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[9]  K. Zhou,et al.  Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation , 2009 .

[10]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .

[11]  Ad de Jong,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[12]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[13]  M. Carree,et al.  Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies , 2004 .

[14]  F. Malerba.  Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[15]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[16]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[17]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[18]  J. S. Long,et al.  Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata, 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[19]  Wolfgang Becker,et al.  R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry , 2004 .

[20]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[21]  K. R. Harrigan.  Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[22]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[23]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[24]  Giorgio Sirilli,et al.  Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys , 1998 .

[25]  D. Teece.  Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[26]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[27]  Paul Geroski,et al.  Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity , 1995 .

[28]  Geoffrey G. Bell.  Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness , 2005 .

[29]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[30]  G. Carroll,et al.  Logics of Organization Theory , 2012 .

[31]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  R&D Alliances and Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2007 .

[32]  Geoffrey G. Bell.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES:CLUSTERS, NETWORKS, AND FIRM INNOVATIVEN ESS , 2005 .

[33]  Gerald E. Lowther.  There are two sides to every story , 1993 .

[34]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[35]  W. Greene,et al.  Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models , 1994 .

[36]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[37]  T. Das,et al.  Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective , 2000 .

[38]  Robert W. Vossen,et al.  Market Power, Industrial Concentration and Innovative Activity , 1998 .

[39]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 , 2022 .

[40]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective , 1995 .

[41]  Massimo G. Colombo,et al.  Alliance form: a test of the contractual and competence perspectives , 2003 .

[42]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[43]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[44]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The system dynamics of collective knowledge: From gradualism and saltationism to punctuated change , 2007 .

[45]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: the role of ties with service intermediaries , 2010 .

[46]  W. H. Newman.  “Focused joint ventures” in transforming economies , 1992 .

[47]  N. Pangarkar,et al.  The bidirectional relationship between competitive intensity and collaboration: Evidence from China , 2009 .

[48]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[49]  S. Wallsten,et al.  The Investment Climate and the Firm: Firm-Level Evidence from China , 2003 .

[50]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[51]  T. Das,et al.  Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances , 1998 .

[52]  S. H. Ang.  Competitive Intensity and Collaboration: Impact on Firm Growth Across Technological Environments , 2008 .

[53]  B. Menguc,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity , 2005 .

[54]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[55]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[56]  Michael J. C. Martin.  Managing Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Technology-Based Firms , 1994 .

[57]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[58]  Q. Vuong.  Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses , 1989 .

[59]  Keith Dickson,et al.  "There are two sides to every story": Innovation and collaboration within networks of large and small firms , 1991 .

[60]  Y. Doz.  The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[61]  Bernard Haudeville,et al.  Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities , 2002 .

[62]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[63]  Diane Lambert,et al.  Zero-inflacted Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing , 1992 .

[64]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[65]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance , 2010 .

[66]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .