Receptive Field Properties of Neurons in the Early Visual Cortex Revealed by Local Spectral Reverse Correlation

We introduce a novel class of white-noise analyses, named local spectral reverse correlation (LSRC), which is capable of revealing various aspects of visual receptive field profiles that were undetectable previously in a single simple measurement. The method is based on spectral analyses in a two-dimensional spatial frequency domain for spatially localized areas within and around their receptive fields. Extracellular single-unit recordings were performed for area 17 and 18 neurons in anesthetized cats. A dynamic dense noise pattern was presented in which the pattern covered an area two to three times larger than the classical receptive field. Spike trains were then cross-correlated with frequency spectra of localized noise pattern to obtain spatially localized selectivity maps in the two-dimensional frequency domain. Our findings are as follows. (1) The new LSRC method allows measurements of two-dimensional frequency tunings and their spatial extent even for cells with substantial nonlinearity. (2) A small subset of neurons shows spatial inhomogeneity in the two-dimensional frequency tunings. (3) In addition to facilitatory response profiles, we can also visualize suppressive profiles localized both in space and spatial frequency domains. Our results suggest that the new analysis technique can be a powerful tool for measuring visual response profiles that contain inhomogeneity in space, as well as for studying neurons with substantial nonlinearities. These features make the method particularly suitable for studying response profiles of neurons in early as well as intermediate extrastriate visual areas.

[1]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulus Statistics Alter the Receptive Field Structure of V1 Neurons , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  C. Connor,et al.  Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[4]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[5]  E. Adelson,et al.  Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Shinji Nishimoto,et al.  Accuracy of subspace mapping of spatiotemporal frequency domain visual receptive fields. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  A. B. Bonds,et al.  Temporal-frequency tuning of cross-orientation suppression in the cat striate cortex , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[9]  BsnNr C. Srorn,et al.  CLASSIFYING SIMPLE AND COMPLEX CELLS ON THE BASIS OF RESPONSE MODULATION , 2002 .

[10]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[11]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  R. Freeman,et al.  Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1 , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  B. Dreher.  Hypercomplex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[20]  J. Hegdé,et al.  Selectivity for Complex Shapes in Primate Visual Area V2 , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  Contrast-Invariant Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex: Thalamocortical Input Tuning and Correlation-Based Intracortical Connectivity , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Rodney Cotterill,et al.  Models of brain function , 1989 .

[25]  C. Baker,et al.  Envelope-responsive neurons in areas 17 and 18 of cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A. B. Bonds.  Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[28]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial receptive field organization of macaque V4 neurons. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Minami Ito,et al.  Representation of Angles Embedded within Contour Stimuli in Area V2 of Macaque Monkeys , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Shapley,et al.  Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Reid,et al.  Rules of Connectivity between Geniculate Cells and Simple Cells in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  R. Shapley,et al.  The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[37]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[38]  D. Heeger.  Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Speed skills: measuring the visual speed analyzing properties of primate MT neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  To appear in: The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 3rd edition Editor: M. Gazzaniga. MIT Press, 2004. Characterization of Neural Responses with Stochastic Stimuli , 2022 .

[43]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[44]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. , 1990, Science.

[46]  J. Touryan,et al.  Isolation of Relevant Visual Features from Random Stimuli for Cortical Complex Cells , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.