Learning and representation in speech and language

[1]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns , 1995, Hearing Research.

[2]  J. Mehler,et al.  Cross-linguistic approaches to speech processing , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  Does sentential prosody help infants organize and remember speech information? , 1994, Cognition.

[4]  V. Gracco,et al.  Speech motor coordination and control: evidence from lip, jaw, and laryngeal movements , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[6]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Human processing of auditory-visual information in speech perception: potential for multimodal human-machine interfaces , 1994, ICSLP.

[7]  Kanae Nishi,et al.  Discrimination of English /r-l/ and /w-y/ by Japanese infants at 6-12 months: language-specific developmental changes in speech perception abilities , 1994, ICSLP.

[8]  O. Aaltonen,et al.  Automatic discrimination of phonetically relevant and irrelevant vowel parameters as reflected by mismatch negativity. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants , 1994, Nature.

[10]  J L Miller,et al.  The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Tests of the perceptual magnet effect for American English /r/ and /l/ , 1994 .

[12]  Joanne L. Miller.  On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report , 1994, Cognition.

[13]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  L. Menn,et al.  Phonological development : models, research, implications , 1994 .

[15]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Young Children′s Representation of Prosodic Phonology: Evidence From English-Speakers′ Weak Syllable Productions , 1994 .

[16]  B. de Boysson-Bardies,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Ambient Language Influence on Infant Vocal Production and Early Words , 1994, Phonetica.

[17]  C. Stoel-Gammon,et al.  Cross-Language Differences in Phonological Acquisition: Swedish and American /t/ , 1994, Phonetica.

[18]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning , 1993, Speech Commun..

[19]  William P. Fifer,et al.  Two-day-olds prefer their native language , 1993 .

[20]  Antoinette T. Gesi,et al.  Bimodal speech perception: an examination across languages , 1993 .

[21]  Y. Tohkura,et al.  Inter-language differences in the influence of visual cues in speech perception. , 1993 .

[22]  D. Burnham.  Visual Recognition of Mother by Young Infants: Facilitation by Speech , 1993, Perception.

[23]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  How do 4-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? , 1993 .

[24]  H. Neville,et al.  Language Acquisition and Cerebral Specialization in 20-Month-Old Infants , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[26]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[27]  A. Liberman.  In Speech Perception, Time Is Not What It Seems , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  William K. Estes,et al.  Concepts, Categories, and Psychological Science , 1993 .

[29]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: a pilot "motor equivalence" study. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  A. Friederici,et al.  Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  T. Bower,et al.  Amodal representation of speech in infants , 1993 .

[32]  J. Sussman,et al.  Identification and change/no‐change discrimination of [i] stimuli: Further tests of the ‘‘magnet’’ effect , 1993 .

[33]  R. K. Clifton,et al.  Newborn Infants' Memory for Speech Sounds Retained Over 24 Hours , 1993 .

[34]  J. Flege.  Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  H. McGurk,et al.  La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Infants' perception and representation of speech: development of a new theory , 1992, ICSLP.

[37]  A. Woodward,et al.  Perception of acoustic correlates of major phrasal units by young infants , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[39]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: Female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  P K Kuhl,et al.  Cross-modal speech perception in adults and infants using nonspeech auditory stimuli. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  A. Fernald,et al.  Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults , 1991 .

[43]  D. Massaro.  Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .

[44]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Birdsong for neurobiologists , 1989, Neuron.

[45]  G. Edelman.  Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[46]  R. Nosofsky.  Exemplar-Based Accounts of Relations Between Classification, Recognition, and Typicality , 1988 .

[47]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Evolution of Multiple Memory Systems , 1987 .

[48]  James L. Morgan,et al.  From Simple Input to Complex Grammar , 1986 .

[49]  A. Decasper,et al.  Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds , 1986 .

[50]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The bimodal perception of speech in infancy. , 1982, Science.

[51]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[52]  Peter W. Jusczyk,et al.  Young infants' retention of information about syllables☆ , 1995 .

[53]  P Iverson,et al.  Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation, Memory, and the Representation of Persons. , 1994, Infant behavior & development.

[55]  P. Jusczyk.  From general to language-specific capacities: the WRAPSA Model of how speech perception develops , 1993 .

[56]  Linda Polka,et al.  The Ontogeny and Developmental Significance of Language-Specific Phonetic Perception , 1993 .

[57]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[58]  J. Lecanuet,et al.  Speech Stimuli in the Fetal Environment , 1993 .

[59]  Kari Suomi,et al.  An outline of a developmental model of adult phonological organization and behavior , 1993 .

[60]  J. Mehler,et al.  The periodicity bias , 1993 .

[61]  M. Vihman.  Variable paths to early word production , 1993 .

[62]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .

[63]  R. N. Aslin,et al.  Segmentation of Fluent Speech into Words: Learning Models and the Role of Maternal Input , 1993 .

[64]  Michael Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Discovering phonetic function , 1993 .

[65]  B. D. Boysson-Bardies,et al.  Ontogeny of Language-Specific Syllabic Productions , 1993 .

[66]  T. Carrell,et al.  Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[67]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Psychoacoustics and speech perception: Internal standards, perceptual anchors, and prototypes. , 1992 .

[68]  A. Fernald.  Human maternal vocalizations to infants as biologically relevant signals: An evolutionary perspective. , 1992 .

[69]  L. Squire.  Memory and Brain , 1987 .

[70]  A. Decasper,et al.  Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices , 1980 .