Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universes

Abstract The notion of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs), which enables experts to utilize a few possible linguistic terms to evaluate varieties of common qualitative information, plays a significant role in handling situations in cases where these experts are hesitant in offering linguistic expressions. For addressing the challenges of information analysis and information fusion in hesitant fuzzy linguistic (HFL) group decision making, in accordance with the multi-granularity three-way decisions paradigm, the primary purpose of this study is to develop the notion of multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets (MG-DTRSs) into the HFL background within the two-universe framework. Having revisited the relevant literature, we first propose a hybrid model named adjustable HFL MG-DTRSs over two universes by introducing an adjustable parameter for the expected risk appetite of experts, in which both optimistic and pessimistic versions of HFL MG-DTRSs over two universes are special cases of the adjustable version. Second, some of the fundamental properties of the proposed model are discussed. Then, on the basis of the presented hybrid model, a group decision making approach within the HFL context is further constructed. Finally, a practical example, a comparative analysis, and a validity test concerning person-job fit problems are explored to reveal the rationality and practicability of the constructed decision making rule.

[1]  Xiaonan Li,et al.  Heterogeneous multigranulation fuzzy rough set-based multiple attribute group decision making with heterogeneous preference information , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  Xiaonan Li,et al.  Three-way decisions approach to multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information-based decision-theoretic rough fuzzy set , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[4]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[5]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Rough sets in distributed decision information systems , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  D. Dubois,et al.  ROUGH FUZZY SETS AND FUZZY ROUGH SETS , 1990 .

[7]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  A Decision Theoretic Framework for Approximating Concepts , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[9]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[10]  Hai-Long Yang,et al.  Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets in incomplete information systems , 2015, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[11]  Decui Liang,et al.  Risk appetite dual hesitant fuzzy three-way decisions with TODIM , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Covering-based multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[13]  Tao Feng,et al.  Variable precision multigranulation decision-theoretic fuzzy rough sets , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Multigranulation rough set model in hesitant fuzzy information systems and its application in person-job fit , 2017, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[16]  Decui Liang,et al.  A Novel Risk Decision Making Based on Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets Under Hesitant Fuzzy Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[17]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  MGRS: A multi-granulation rough set , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Rough Sets and Three-Way Decisions , 2015, RSKT.

[19]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Decision-Theoretic Rough Set Models , 2007, RSKT.

[20]  S. K. Wong,et al.  A NON-NUMERIC APPROACH TO UNCERTAIN REASONING , 1995 .

[21]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[22]  Yuhua Qian,et al.  Multigranulation fuzzy rough set over two universes and its application to decision making , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[23]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Decision-theoretic three-way approximations of fuzzy sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[24]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  An Outline of a Theory of Three-Way Decisions , 2012, RSCTC.

[25]  Chao Zhang,et al.  A Pythagorean Fuzzy Multigranulation Probabilistic Model for Mine Ventilator Fault Diagnosis , 2018, Complex..

[26]  Can Gao,et al.  Multigranulation rough-fuzzy clustering based on shadowed sets , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Weihua Xu,et al.  Generalized multigranulation double-quantitative decision-theoretic rough set , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[28]  Deyu Li,et al.  An interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multigranulation rough set over two universes model for steam turbine fault diagnosis , 2017 .

[29]  Jiye Liang,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy linguistic rough set over two universes model and its applications , 2018, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern..

[30]  Jiye Liang,et al.  International Journal of Approximate Reasoning Multigranulation Decision-theoretic Rough Sets , 2022 .

[31]  Haiyan Zhao,et al.  An approach to emergency decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set over two universes , 2016, Soft Comput..

[32]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[33]  Decui Liang,et al.  A novel three-way decision model based on incomplete information system , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[34]  Bingzhen Sun,et al.  Multigranulation rough set theory over two universes , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[35]  Jianming Zhan,et al.  Two types of coverings based multigranulation rough fuzzy sets and applications to decision making , 2018, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[36]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  The superiority of three-way decisions in probabilistic rough set models , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[37]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-Way Decisions and Cognitive Computing , 2016, Cognitive Computation.

[38]  Bao Qing Hu,et al.  Three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets in multiset-valued information tables , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Han-Chen Huang,et al.  Pairwise Comparison and Distance Measure of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets , 2014 .

[41]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[42]  Na Zhao,et al.  Operators and Comparisons of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[43]  Richard Weber,et al.  Credit scoring using three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[44]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-Way Decision: An Interpretation of Rules in Rough Set Theory , 2009, RSKT.

[45]  Jiye Liang,et al.  Pessimistic rough set based decisions: A multigranulation fusion strategy , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[46]  Jiye Liang,et al.  A fuzzy multigranulation decision-theoretic approach to multi-source fuzzy information systems , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[47]  Xia Xiao,et al.  Three-way group decision making based on multigranulation fuzzy decision-theoretic rough set over two universes , 2017, Int. J. Approx. Reason..