Robot-amplified manual exploration improves load identification.

We tested how manual exploration with anisotropic loading (Viscosity-Only (negative), Inertia-Only, or Combined-Load) influenced skill transfer to the isolated inertial load. Intact subjects (N=39) performed manual exploration with an anisotropic load before evaluation with prescribed circular movements. Combined-Load resulted in lower error (6.89±3.25%) compared to Inertia-Only (8.40±4.32%) and Viscosity-Only (8.17±4.13%) according to radial deviation analysis (% of trial mean radius). An analysis of sensitivity to load variation in normal and catch trials reveals performance differences were likely due to changes in feedforward mass compensation. Analysis of exploration movement revealed higher average speeds (12.0%) and endpoint forces (22.9%) with Combined-Load exploration compared to Inertia-Only. Our findings suggest that free movements amplified by negative viscosity can enhance the ability to identify changes in inertial loading.

[1]  Yoky Matsuoka,et al.  Using visual feedback distortion to alter coordinated pinching patterns for robotic rehabilitation , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Arm-Training with T-WREX After Chronic Stroke: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[3]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Context-dependent anticipation of different task dynamics: rapid recall of appropriate motor skills using visual cues. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  E. Shoenfelt,et al.  Comparison of Constant and Variable Practice Conditions on Free-Throw Shooting , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  S. Schaal,et al.  One-Handed Juggling: A Dynamical Approach to a Rhythmic Movement Task. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Felix C Huang,et al.  Visual and Haptic Feedback Contribute to Tuning and Online Control During Object Manipulation , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  A 1-DOF assistive exoskeleton with virtual negative damping: effects on the kinematic response of the lower limbs , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Jeffrey T. Fairbrother,et al.  Differential Transfer Benefits of Increased Practice for Constant, Blocked, and Serial Practice Schedules , 2002, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  J. Patton,et al.  Visual error augmentation for enhancing motor learning and rehabilitative relearning , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  The Role of Inertial Sensitivity in Motor Planning , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  The human power amplifier technology at the University of California, Berkeley , 1996, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[15]  C H Shea,et al.  Consistent and Variable Practice Conditions: Effects on Relative and Absolute Timing , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.