Fusing Frontal and Occipital EEG Features to Detect “Brain Switch” by Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network

Flicker is the most widely used steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) stimulus. In addition, checkerboard can induce steady-state motion visual evoked potential (SSMVEP) in the occipital area. More recently, the action video is proposed to simultaneously elicit SSMVEP and induce sensorimotor area activations via the mirror neuron systems through Action Observation (AO). Integration of AO with brain–computer interface (BCI) is appealing for neural rehabilitation applications. In order to make such a BCI paradigm more feasible in neural rehabilitation, it is essential to discriminate whether a user is actively engaged with the BCI, i.e. intentional control (IC) state, or not engaged, i.e. non-intentional control (NC) state. In this study, the EEG responses to these three types of visual stimuli were compared for the first time and a convolutional neural network (CNN) was proposed to discriminate IC and NC states. A visual gaiting stimulus was designed to realize BCI-based AO. The results showed that the power of alpha rhythms from frontal area decreased more when the participants engaged at the gaiting stimuli than when the participants engaged at the other two types of stimuli. In addition, the correlation coefficient between the EEG from the occipital area and the template signals increased when the participants engaged at the stimuli. The results also clearly demonstrated the proposed CNN method can discriminate the IC and NC states. In addition, the combination of the attention feature from the frontal area and the SSVEP/SSMVEP feature from the occipital area showed significant performance improvement for the gaiting stimulus, but not for the other two types of stimuli.

[1]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  A P300-Based Threshold-Free Brain Switch and Its Application in Wheelchair Control , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  Feng Li,et al.  Discrimination Between Control and Idle States in Asynchronous SSVEP-Based Brain Switches: A Pseudo-Key-Based Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  J. Ku,et al.  A Brain–Computer Interface-Based Action Observation Game That Enhances Mu Suppression , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[7]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Hybrid P300 and mu-beta brain computer interface to operate a brain controlled wheelchair , 2008 .

[8]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  α-Band Electroencephalographic Activity over Occipital Cortex Indexes Visuospatial Attention Bias and Predicts Visual Target Detection , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Pan-ngum,et al.  Brain signal detection methodology for attention training using minimal EEG channels , 2012, 2012 Tenth International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering.

[10]  Vijayan K. Asari,et al.  The History Began from AlexNet: A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Learning Approaches , 2018, ArXiv.

[11]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Brain response to luminance-based and motion-based stimulation using inter-modulation frequencies , 2017, PloS one.

[12]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain-computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Four Novel Motion Paradigms Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  S. V. Adamovich,et al.  Visuomotor Discordance During Visually-Guided Hand Movement in Virtual Reality Modulates Sensorimotor Cortical Activity in Healthy and Hemiparetic Subjects , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  A hybrid brain–computer interface based on the fusion of electroencephalographic and electromyographic activities , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Yodchanan Wongsawat,et al.  Hybrid EEG-EOG brain-computer interface system for practical machine control , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[17]  C Neuper,et al.  A comparison of three brain–computer interfaces based on event-related desynchronization, steady state visual evoked potentials, or a hybrid approach using both signals , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  Silvia Comani,et al.  A Post-Stroke Rehabilitation System Integrating Robotics, VR and High-Resolution EEG Imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  An asynchronous wheelchair control by hybrid EEG–EOG brain–computer interface , 2014, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[20]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  A Hybrid BCI System Combining P300 and SSVEP and Its Application to Wheelchair Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency Recognition Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  A lower limb exoskeleton control system based on steady state visual evoked potentials , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Ying Sun,et al.  Asynchronous P300 BCI: SSVEP-based control state detection , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[24]  Donald L. Schomer,et al.  The Normal EEG in an Adult , 2007 .

[25]  Rabab K. Ward,et al.  The Design of a Point-and-Click System by Integrating a Self-Paced Brain–Computer Interface With an Eye-Tracker , 2011, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[26]  Ning-Han Liu,et al.  Recognizing the Degree of Human Attention Using EEG Signals from Mobile Sensors , 2013, Sensors.

[27]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Cortical mechanisms underlying the organization of goal-directed actions and mirror neuron-based action understanding. , 2014, Physiological reviews.

[28]  Vicente Mut,et al.  Attention-level transitory response: a novel hybrid BCI approach. , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Gene Eu Jan,et al.  An Interactive Upper-Limb Post-Stroke Rehabilitation System Integrating BCI-based Attention Monitoring and Virtual Reality Feedback , 2016, 2016 Third International Conference on Computing Measurement Control and Sensor Network (CMCSN).

[30]  Jing Wang,et al.  Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potentials Produced by Oscillating Newton's Rings: Implications for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Miku Matsubara,et al.  Action observation facilitates motor cortical activity in patients with stroke and hemiplegia , 2017, Neuroscience Research.

[32]  A. G. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Automatic user customized brain switch , 2016, 2016 IEEE Annual India Conference (INDICON).

[33]  Toshihisa Tanaka,et al.  Asynchronous Brain–Computer Interfacing Based on Mixed-Coded Visual Stimuli , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.