H-Infinity gain scheduling design for the meridian UAS for a broader range of operation and for fault tolerant applications

This paper describes the design of a MIMO H-infinity gain schedule for the Meridian UAS and illustrates its application for an extended operational range and for a moderate fault tolerant capability. The gain scheduling concept is based on smooth interpolation between two H-infinity controllers, covering a broad range of trim conditions. This interpolation is provided by the homogeneous design of the controllers by using the same augmented model structure within the H-infinity algorithm. The scheduling variable is defined as the commanded airspeed, acting as an exogenous variable, driving a smooth transition between the current and the next controller. The utilization of an exogenous signal avoids the occurrence of hidden coupling effects, typical in gain scheduling applications. Also, a new procedure is defined to adapt the controller when a failure or a significant dynamic change in the UAS takes place. Using the best knowledge of the failure the H-infinity controller is calculated. This controller is computed with a predefined gamma value, avoiding iterations, generating the new controller instantaneously.

[1]  K. Glover,et al.  State-space formulae for all stabilizing controllers that satisfy an H(infinity)-norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity , 1988 .

[2]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Gain scheduling for H-infinity controllers: a flight control example , 1993, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[4]  Ronald Hess,et al.  Review of Aircraft Control and Simulation, 2nd Ed. , 2004 .

[5]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[6]  C. Edward Lan.  ESTIMATION OF UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC MODELS FROM FLIGHT TEST DATA , 2001 .

[7]  Shahriar Keshmiri,et al.  Advanced H-Infinity Trainer Autopilot , 2010 .

[8]  Shahriar Keshmiri,et al.  Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of the Meridian Unmanned Aircraft , 2009 .

[9]  I. Postlethwaite,et al.  Design of Flight Controllers based on Simplified LPV model of a UAV , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Richard D. Hale,et al.  Design and Structural Analysis of the Meridian Unmanned Aircraft , 2008 .

[11]  William E. Faller,et al.  Real-time prediction of unsteady aerodynamics: Application for aircraft control and manoeuvrability enhancement , 1995, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Research on gain scheduling , 2000, Autom..

[13]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H/sub 2/ and H/sub infinity / control problems , 1989 .

[14]  R. A. Kuttieri,et al.  Neural Partial Differential Method for Extracting Aerodynamic Derivatives from Flight Data , 2010 .

[15]  P. Khargonekar,et al.  State-space solutions to standard H2 and H(infinity) control problems , 1989 .

[16]  Mark H Lowenberg,et al.  Dynamic gain scheduled control of a Hawk scale model , 2007 .

[17]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Stability preserving interpolation methods for the synthesis of gain scheduled controllers , 2000, Autom..

[18]  Gary J. Balas,et al.  Systematic Gain-Scheduling Control Design: A Missile Autopilot Example , 2008 .

[19]  Nabil Aouf,et al.  A gain scheduling approach for a flexible aircraft , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[20]  K. Glover,et al.  State-space formulae for all stabilizing controllers that satisfy and H ∞ norm bound and relations to risk sensitivity , 1988 .

[21]  J. Doyle,et al.  Essentials of Robust Control , 1997 .

[22]  Donglong Sheu,et al.  Estimation of Turbulent Vertical Velocity from Nonlinear Simulations of Aircraft Response , 2011 .