Privileged coding of convex shapes in human object-selective cortex.

What is the neural code for object shape? Despite intensive research, the precise nature of object representations in high-level visual cortex remains elusive. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to show that convex shapes are encoded in a privileged fashion by human lateral occipital complex (LOC), a region that has been implicated in object recognition. On each trial, two convex or two concave shapes that were either identical or different were presented sequentially. Critically, the convex and concave stimuli were the same except for a binocular disparity change that reversed the figure-ground assignment. The fMRI response in LOC for convex stimuli was higher for different than that for identical shape pairs, indicating sensitivity to differences in convex shape. However, when the same stimuli were seen as concave, the response for different and identical pairs was the same, indicating lower sensitivity to changes in concave shape than convex shape. This pattern was more pronounced in the anterior than that in the posterior portion of LOC. These results suggest that convex contours could be important elements in cortical object representations.

[1]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  J. Hulleman,et al.  Concavities as basic features in visual search: Evidence from search asymmetries , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Detection of change in shape: an advantage for concavities , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  Robert Desimone,et al.  PROPERTIES OF INFERIOR TEMPORAL NEURONS IN THE MACAQUE , 1981 .

[6]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  I. Biederman,et al.  Neural evidence for intermediate representations in object recognition , 2006, Vision Research.

[8]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  I. Biederman,et al.  Shape Tuning in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[13]  Victor A. F. Lamme The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  H. Ross,et al.  Information Concentration along the Boundary Contours of Naturally Shaped Solid Objects , 2001, Perception.

[17]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  T. Hendler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. Connor,et al.  Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  F. Fang,et al.  Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  D. C. Beardslee,et al.  Readings in perception , 1958 .

[24]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[25]  Jon Driver,et al.  One-Sided Edge Assignment in Vision: 2. Part Decomposition, Shape Description, and Attention to Objects , 1995 .

[26]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[27]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  D. Kersten,et al.  Orientation-tuned FMRI adaptation in human visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  A Search Asymmetry Reversed by Figure-Ground Assignment , 2000, Psychological science.

[32]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  fMRI reveals a preference for near viewing in the human parieto-occipital cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[36]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of Visual Objects: An Experimental Test of the Minima Rule , 1989, Perception.

[38]  C. Connor,et al.  Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  B. Fischer,et al.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[40]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[41]  C. Blakemore The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[43]  Manish Singh,et al.  What change detection tells us about the visual representation of shape. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[44]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Shape‐selective stereo processing in human object‐related visual areas , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[46]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[47]  F. Qiu,et al.  Figure and Ground in the Visual Cortex: V2 Combines Stereoscopic Cues with Gestalt Rules , 2005, Neuron.

[48]  I. Biederman,et al.  Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[50]  B KimiaBenjamin,et al.  Shapes, shocks, and deformations I , 1995 .

[51]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[53]  Whitman Richards,et al.  Attentional frames, frame curves and figural boundaries: The inside/outside dilemma , 1996, Vision Research.

[54]  M. Bertamini,et al.  The Importance of Being Convex: An Advantage for Convexity when Judging Position , 2001, Perception.

[55]  I. Howard,et al.  The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End , 1982, Perception.

[57]  Mark M Schira,et al.  Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Parts of Visual Form: Computational Aspects , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[59]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: The components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.