Wind farm hub height optimization

The objective of this study is to assess the effect of hub height optimization on the Annual Energy Production (AEP) of a wind farm. The only optimization variable is the hub height of each wind turbine and all other characteristics of the wind farm, including base location, rotor diameter (D), and total number of wind turbines, remain unchanged. The first case study consisted of two wind turbines aligned with the wind direction, with the hub height of the upstream turbine fixed and that of the downstream turbine varying. Two competing effects were identified. On one hand, lowering the hub height of the downwind turbine exposes a larger fraction of the downwind rotor to the undisturbed wind and therefore increases its power production. On the other hand, turbines with lower hub heights experience lower wind speeds due to shear. The balance between these two effects is complicated by surface roughness and spacing between turbines. The maximum benefits are found offshore, with tight axial spacing (⩽5D). To put into perspective the effectiveness of using multiple hub heights in a realistic setting, the second case compared two 20-turbine wind farms with the same horizontal layout, turbine type, and wind direction, but one with all turbines installed at the same hub height (80m) and the second with alternating rows of tall (100m) and short (57.5m) wind turbines. The vertically staggered configuration was found to produce approximately 5.4% more power. Lastly, a real 48-turbine wind farm (Lillgrund in Sweden) was optimized under all 360 wind directions and wind speeds ranging from the cut-in to the cut-out using a greedy search algorithm. The optimal configuration presented a non-intuitive and balanced mix of 26 tall and 22 short turbines. Although the entire range from a minimum to a maximum predefined hub height was searched to determine the optimal hub height for each wind turbine, the optimization algorithm ended up with an optimal layout in which the hub height of each turbine was equal to either the minimum hub height or the maximum hub height and no value in between was assigned to any of the turbines. The AEP of the optimized wind farm with multiple hub heights was approximately 2% (10GWh) higher than that of the wind farm with a single hub height. The PARK model was used in this study to calculate wake losses and to perform the optimization. To validate its results, Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) of the flow around the turbines, represented as actuator lines, were conducted at fine spatial and temporal resolutions. The LES results confirmed that optimizing hub heights is beneficial and indicated that the net gains were actually higher (by up to a factor of two) than those calculated with PARK.

[1]  A. Gosman,et al.  Solution of the implicitly discretised reacting flow equations by operator-splitting , 1986 .

[2]  Sangook Jun,et al.  Numerical optimization of site selection for offshore wind turbine installation using genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[3]  Jens Nørkær Sørensen,et al.  Numerical Modeling of Wind Turbine Wakes , 2002 .

[4]  Dirk Söffker,et al.  State-of-the-art in wind turbine control: Trends and challenges , 2016 .

[5]  Lin Wang,et al.  State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: aeroelastic modelling , 2016 .

[6]  J. P. V. Doormaal,et al.  ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOWS , 1984 .

[7]  Charles Meneveau,et al.  Benefits of collocating vertical-axis and horizontal-axis wind turbines in large wind farms , 2017 .

[8]  Lin Lu,et al.  Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model , 2016 .

[9]  Cristina L. Archer,et al.  Wind farms with counter-rotating wind turbines , 2017 .

[10]  Charles Meneveau,et al.  Effects of turbine spacing on the power output of extended wind-farms , 2016, 1707.01807.

[11]  Erin F. MacDonald,et al.  A system-level cost-of-energy wind farm layout optimization with landowner modeling , 2014 .

[12]  C. Justus,et al.  Height variation of wind speed and wind distributions statistics , 1976 .

[13]  David Wood,et al.  Development of an Analytical Unsteady Model for Wind Turbine Aerodynamic Response to Linear Pitch Changes , 2016 .

[14]  C. Moeng.  A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence , 1984 .

[15]  Kincho H. Law,et al.  Layout optimization for maximizing wind farm power production using sequential convex programming , 2015 .

[16]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Optimisation for offshore wind farm cable connection layout using adaptive particle swarm optimisation minimum spanning tree method , 2016 .

[17]  Qing Song,et al.  Wind farm layout optimization using genetic algorithm with different hub height wind turbines , 2013 .

[18]  Zhiwei Gao,et al.  Pitch control for wind turbine systems using optimization, estimation and compensation , 2016 .

[19]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[20]  Kathryn E. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating techniques for redirecting turbine wakes using SOWFA , 2014 .

[21]  Niranjan Ghaisas,et al.  Evaluation of layout and atmospheric stability effects in wind farms using large‐eddy simulation , 2017 .

[22]  D. Spalding,et al.  A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , 1972 .

[23]  Stefano Leonardi,et al.  Large eddy simulations of the flow past wind turbines: actuator line and disk modeling , 2015 .

[24]  Cristina H. Amon,et al.  Toward efficient optimization of wind farm layouts: Utilizing exact gradient information , 2016 .

[25]  Erin F. MacDonald,et al.  Modeling noise and lease soft costs improves wind farm design and cost-of-energy predictions , 2016 .

[26]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Variable-sized wind turbines are a possibility for wind farm optimization , 2014 .

[27]  Peter A. N. Bosman,et al.  Wake losses optimization of offshore wind farms with moveable floating wind turbines , 2015 .

[28]  Lin Lu,et al.  Study on offshore wind power potential and wind farm optimization in Hong Kong , 2014 .

[29]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  GIS-based wind farm site selection using spatial multi-criteria analysis (SMCA): Evaluating the case for New York State , 2011 .

[30]  Houria Siguerdidjane,et al.  Nonlinear control with wind estimation of a DFIG variable speed wind turbine for power capture optimization , 2009 .

[31]  Bryony DuPont,et al.  An advanced modeling system for optimization of wind farm layout and wind turbine sizing using a multi-level extended pattern search algorithm , 2016 .

[32]  Mengxuan Song,et al.  Wind turbine layout optimization with multiple hub height wind turbines using greedy algorithm , 2016 .

[33]  Chi Jeng Bai,et al.  Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs) , 2016 .

[34]  J. Christopher Beck,et al.  Wind farm layout optimization on complex terrains – Integrating a CFD wake model with mixed-integer programming , 2016 .

[35]  Rupp Carriveau,et al.  Wake impacts on downstream wind turbine performance and yaw alignment , 2013 .

[36]  C. L. Archer,et al.  Quantifying the sensitivity of wind farm performance to array layout options using large‐eddy simulation , 2013 .

[37]  Peter A. N. Bosman,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of wind farm layouts – Complexity, constraint handling and scalability , 2016 .

[38]  Longyan Wang,et al.  Comparison of the effectiveness of analytical wake models for wind farm with constant and variable hub heights , 2016 .

[39]  Longyan Wang,et al.  A novel control strategy approach to optimally design a wind farm layout , 2016 .

[40]  Mohammad Yusri Hassan,et al.  Wake effect modeling: A review of wind farm layout optimization using Jensen׳s model , 2016 .

[41]  Niranjan Ghaisas,et al.  Geometry-Based Models for Studying the Effects of Wind Farm Layout , 2015 .