Mechanisms of Attention

This chapter reviews some of the studies demonstrating that attention is associated with an increase in activity in the brain region concerned with the processing of whatever it is that is being attended to. The basic assumption is that there is competition between stimuli for processing by the nervous system. The stimulus that wins this competition elicits more neural activity and becomes the focus of attention. Furthermore, chapter discusses the biased competition model, which states that a stimulus gains attention by winning a competition with other stimuli. The biased competition model has provided a very useful framework for guiding neuroimaging studies of selective attention in many different laboratories. However, the biased competition model is underspecified. It states that there are bottom-up processes that determine which stimulus will win the competition for attention, but it does not say anything about the intrinsic properties of the stimulus that wins. The model states that there is a top-down biasing signal that modifies the competition, bu t it does not say anything about the nature of this top-down signal. The last section of this chapter makes some suggestions that go slightly beyond the biased competition model. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998, Nature.

[3]  S. Zeki,et al.  Three cortical stages of colour processing in the human brain. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[5]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.

[6]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[9]  John Duncan,et al.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities , 1997, Nature.

[10]  Carol L Colby,et al.  Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  C. Price The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  State dependent activity in monkey visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980 .

[16]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  A. Chaudhuri Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention , 1990, Nature.

[18]  C. Frith,et al.  Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. , 1999, Science.

[19]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[20]  D. Mumford,et al.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Treisman,et al.  Selective Attention: Perception or Response? , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[23]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  S. Blakemore,et al.  Delusions of alien control in the normal brain , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  C. Frith,et al.  How do we select perceptions and actions? Human brain imaging studies. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  Malcolm P. Young,et al.  Objective analysis of the topological organization of the primate cortical visual system , 1992, Nature.

[27]  J. Kaas,et al.  A representation of the visual field in the caudal third of the middle tempral gyrus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). , 1971, Brain research.

[28]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Relating Macroscopic Measures of Brain Activity to Fast, Dynamic Neuronal Interactions , 2000, Neural Computation.

[30]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  C. Koch,et al.  Brain Areas Specific for Attentional Load in a Motion-Tracking Task , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-Stimulation Alters Human Sensory Brain Responses , 1973, Science.

[33]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[35]  G. Mangun,et al.  ERP and fMRI measures of visual spatial selective attention , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[36]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Role of the Thalamus in “Top Down” Modulation of Attention to Sound , 1996, NeuroImage.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[39]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  The Cerebellum Contributes to Somatosensory Cortical Activity during Self-Produced Tactile Stimulation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[40]  J. Gore,et al.  A Stimulus-Driven Approach to Object Identity and Location Processing in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[41]  R A Andersen,et al.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[42]  C. Frith,et al.  Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: from stimulus–response to script–report , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[45]  Irvin Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981 .

[46]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[48]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[49]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[50]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.

[51]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[52]  C. Frith,et al.  Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention. , 2000, Science.

[53]  J. Gore,et al.  Neural Correlates of the Attentional Blink , 2000, Neuron.

[54]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[57]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural consequences of competing stimuli in both visual hemifields: A physiological basis for visual extinction , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[59]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Top-down modulation of early sensory cortex. , 1997 .

[60]  R. Campbell,et al.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex , 2000, Current Biology.

[61]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action , 1999, Neuroreport.

[62]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  A. Dale,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, Nature.

[64]  D. Broadbent,et al.  From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  D. Simons Attentional capture and inattentional blindness , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[67]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Working Memory for Location and Time: Activity in Prefrontal Area 46 Relates to Selection Rather than Maintenance in Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[68]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Parietal neglect and visual awareness , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[69]  R. S. Corteen,et al.  Autonomic responses to shock-associated words in an unattended channel. , 1972, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[70]  C. Frith,et al.  Differential Activation of Right Superior Parietal Cortex and Intraparietal Sulcus by Spatial and Nonspatial Attention , 1998, NeuroImage.

[71]  D. Simons,et al.  Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption , 2000, Perception.

[72]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[75]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[76]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Response Functions Characterizing Brain Areas Using fMRI Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load , 2001, Neuron.

[77]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex , 2000, Neuroreport.

[78]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[79]  S. Kiebel,et al.  Brain Representation of Active and Passive Movements , 1996, NeuroImage.

[80]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  G. Curio,et al.  Speaking modifies voice‐evoked activity in the human auditory cortex , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[82]  C. Frith,et al.  Unconscious activation of visual cortex in the damaged right hemisphere of a parietal patient with extinction. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[83]  C D Frith,et al.  Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[84]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’ , 1999, Nature.

[85]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[86]  C. Frith,et al.  How do we predict the consequences of our actions? a functional imaging study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.