Children Change Their Answers in Response to Neutral Follow‐Up Questions by a Knowledgeable Asker

Abstract Burgeoning evidence suggests that when children observe data, they use knowledge of the demonstrator's intent to augment learning. We propose that the effects of social learning may go beyond cases where children observe data, to cases where they receive no new information at all. We present a model of how simply asking a question a second time may lead to belief revision, when the questioner is expected to know the correct answer. We provide an analysis of the CHILDES corpus to show that these neutral follow‐up questions are used in parent–child conversations. We then present three experiments investigating 4‐ and 5‐year‐old children's reactions to neutral follow‐up questions posed by ignorant or knowledgeable questioners. Children were more likely to change their answers in response to a neutral follow‐up question from a knowledgeable questioner than an ignorant one. We discuss the implications of these results in the context of common practices in legal, educational, and experimental psychological settings.

[1]  T. Griffiths,et al.  NAÏVE THEORIES, AMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE Page 1 Running head: NAÏVE THEORIES AND AMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE Can being scared make your tummy ache? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence and preschoolers’ causal inferences , 2007 .

[2]  C. Glymour,et al.  Preschool children learn about causal structure from conditional interventions. , 2007, Developmental science.

[3]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Children's causal inferences from conflicting testimony and observations. , 2016, Developmental psychology.

[4]  L. Schulz,et al.  Children balance theories and evidence in exploration, explanation, and learning , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  P. Harris,et al.  Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. , 2005, Child development.

[6]  V. Jaswal,et al.  Adults Don't Always Know Best , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  E. Loftus,et al.  The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children , 1976 .

[8]  T. Griffiths,et al.  Can being scared cause tummy aches? Naive theories, ambiguous evidence, and preschoolers' causal inferences. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[9]  D. Poole,et al.  Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. , 1991 .

[10]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play , 2011, Cognition.

[11]  D. Sobel,et al.  Children monitor individuals' expertise for word learning. , 2010, Child development.

[12]  D. Poole,et al.  Tell me again and again: Stability and change in the repeated testimonies of children and adults. , 1995 .

[13]  P. Howie,et al.  ‘Undesirable’ and ‘desirable’ shifts in children's responses to repeated questions: age differences in the effect of providing a rationale for repetition , 2004 .

[14]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[15]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Children's social referencing reflects sensitivity to graded uncertainty , 2017, CogSci.

[16]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Causal learning across domains. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[17]  Yvonne Jaeger.  Memory And Testimony In The Child Witness , 2016 .

[18]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Yi Ting Huang,et al.  Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. Snedeker,et al.  Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[21]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[22]  Kathleen H Corriveau,et al.  Young children's selective trust in informants , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Baxter S. Eaves,et al.  Epistemic trust: modeling children's reasoning about others' knowledge and intent. , 2012, Developmental science.

[24]  Josef Perner,et al.  Early Deception and the Child's Theory of Mind: False Trails and Genuine Markers , 1991 .

[25]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery , 2011, Cognition.

[26]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  The Ontogenesis of Trust , 2004 .

[27]  E. Markman,et al.  Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. , 2012, Child development.

[28]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface , 2003, Cognition.

[29]  L. Schulz,et al.  16-Month-Olds Rationally Infer Causes of Failed Actions , 2011, Science.

[30]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Children’s imitation of causal action sequences is influenced by statistical and pedagogical evidence , 2011, Cognition.

[31]  M. Blades,et al.  The effect of repeated questioning on children's accuracy and consistency in eyewitness testimony , 2009 .

[32]  M. Lamb,et al.  Do we need to rethink guidance on repeated interviews , 2010 .

[33]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Debra A. Poole,et al.  Two years later: Effect of question repetition and retention interval on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. , 1993 .

[35]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[36]  L. Brown,et al.  Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion , 2001 .

[37]  H. Diessel.  Corpus linguistics and language acquisition , 2007 .

[38]  P. Harris,et al.  Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[39]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[40]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Children's Pragmatic Inferences as a Route for Learning About the World. , 2016, Child Development.

[41]  H. Wellman,et al.  Young Children Use Statistical Sampling to Infer the Preferences of Other People , 2010, Psychological science.

[42]  W. Thompson,et al.  Do Jurors “Know” What Isn’t So About Child Witnesses? , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[43]  David Barner,et al.  Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions , 2005 .

[45]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.