Do intuitive and deliberate judgments rely on two distinct neural systems? A case study in face processing

Arguably the most influential models of human decision-making today are based on the assumption that two separable systems – intuition and deliberation – underlie the judgments that people make. Our recent work is among the first to present neural evidence contrary to the predictions of these dual-systems accounts. We measured brain activations using functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants were specifically instructed to either intuitively or deliberately judge the authenticity of emotional facial expressions. Results from three different analyses revealed both common brain networks of activation across decision mode and differential activations as a function of strategy adherence. We take our results to contradict popular dual-systems accounts that propose a clear-cut dichotomy of the processing systems, and to support rather a unified model. According to this, intuitive and deliberate judgment processes rely on the same rules, though only the former are thought to be characterized by non-conscious processing.

[1]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  From affect to control: Functional specialization of the insula in motivation and regulation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior , 2015 .

[3]  Antonio Ferretti,et al.  Resting State BOLD Functional Connectivity at 3T: Spin Echo versus Gradient Echo EPI , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Sebastian Korb,et al.  The two sides of spontaneity: Movement onset asymmetries in facial expressions influence social judgments , 2014 .

[5]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Effects of processing style on responsiveness to affective stimuli and processing fluency , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[6]  Christoph Braun,et al.  Feeling before knowing why: The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in intuitive judgments—an MEG study , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  Julie Y. Huang,et al.  The Selfish Goal: autonomously operating motivational structures as the proximate cause of human judgment and behavior. , 2014, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Blocking mimicry makes true and false smiles look the same Rychlowska , 2014 .

[9]  Kirsten G. Volz,et al.  Primed for intuition , 2014 .

[10]  J. Proust.  The Representational Structure of Feelings , 2014 .

[11]  S. Sloman.  Two systems of reasoning: An update. , 2014 .

[12]  Y. Trope,et al.  Two of what? A conceptual analysis of dual‑process theories of the social mind , 2014 .

[13]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Conscious and unconscious: Toward an integrative understanding of human mental life and action. , 2014 .

[14]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .

[15]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Decisions Under Risk are not the Same as in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  Intuition, reason, and metacognition , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Intuitive and Deliberate Judgments Are Based on Common Principles This Article Has Been Corrected. See Last Page , 2022 .

[19]  M. Peelen,et al.  Supramodal Representations of Perceived Emotions in the Human Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Graeme D. Jackson,et al.  Focal epileptiform spikes do not show a canonical BOLD response in patients with benign rolandic epilepsy (BECTS) , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[22]  Foundations for tracing intuition: Models, findings, categorizations , 2010 .

[23]  A. Glöckner,et al.  Methods for inducing intuitive and deliberate processing modes. , 2010 .

[24]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods , 2010 .

[25]  Werner Van Belle,et al.  Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces’ sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data , 2009, Vision Research.

[26]  P. McGuire,et al.  Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. , 2009, Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN.

[27]  G. Keren,et al.  Two Is Not Always Better Than One , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal forecasting , 2009 .

[29]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The fusiform face area and occipital face area show sensitivity to spatial relations in faces , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[31]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  How Distinct are Intuition and Deliberation? An Eye-Tracking Analysis of Instruction-Induced Decision Modes , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.

[32]  N. Sadato,et al.  Perspective-taking as part of narrative comprehension: A functional MRI study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  A. Craig,et al.  How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Krishna P. Miyapuram,et al.  Imaging Brain Regions with Susceptibility-induced Signal Losses using Gradient and Spin Echo Techniques , 2009 .

[35]  David H. Zald,et al.  The Orbitofrontal Cortex , 2008 .

[36]  C. Nathan DeWall,et al.  Evidence that logical reasoning depends on conscious processing , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Cortical regions activated by the subjective sense of perceptual coherence of environmental sounds: A proposal for a neuroscience of intuition , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[38]  Cilia L. M. Witteman,et al.  Fitting decisions: Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies , 2008 .

[39]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  Norman W. Kettner,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Pain Perception , 2008 .

[42]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Neural processes underlying intuitive coherence judgments as revealed by fMRI on a semantic judgment task , 2007, NeuroImage.

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  What Neuroscience Can Tell about Intuitive Processes in the Context of Perceptual Discovery , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  T. Goschke,et al.  On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[48]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[49]  H. Crombie,et al.  Two sides. , 2005, Connecticut medicine.

[50]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards , 2004, Science.

[51]  F. Strack,et al.  Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[52]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[53]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[54]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  P. Ekman.  Darwin, Deception, and Facial Expression , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[56]  D. Kahneman.  A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[57]  J. Lewin.  Functional MRI: An introduction to methods , 2003 .

[58]  R. Adolphs.  Cognitive neuroscience: Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[60]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[61]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Detection versus Estimation in Event-Related fMRI: Choosing the Optimal Stimulus Timing , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference , 2002 .

[63]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[64]  Keith J. Worsley,et al.  Statistical analysis of activation images , 2001 .

[65]  L. Jacobs.  The Two Sides , 2001 .

[66]  H. Critchley,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of social behaviour: changes in cerebral blood flow when people with autistic disorder process facial expressions. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[67]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[68]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[69]  Pierre Philippot,et al.  Facial Reactions to Emotional Facial Expressions: Affect or Cognition? , 1998 .

[70]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[71]  Delta Ferrite Measurement.  The Effects of Processing on , 1983 .