Measuring whole-building performance with dynamic LCA : a case study of a green university building

This paper presents initial results of an ongoing project to monitor energy consumption and indoor environmental quality in a green university building, and to include the measured data in a dynamic life cycle assessment (DLCA) of the building. DLCA can be defined as an approach to life cycle assessment (LCA) that explicitly incorporates dynamic process modelling in the context of temporal and spatial variations in the surrounding industrial and environmental systems. DLCA has been suggested to be important for buildings due to their long lifetimes, during which they may undergo significant operational changes. An important part of the dynamic process modeling component is the measurement of actual data to validate or refine predictive models. A static LCA of the building was completed, including construction materials and a whole-building energy model. An initial DLCA was conducted incorporating estimates of future industrial and environmental factors, exemplified by energy mixes and emissions factors from energy production. Partial data from the building’s operations were compared to energy model predictions and then incorporated into the DLCA model. Results showed substantial differences between impacts due to estimated actual energy consumption and energy model results, suggesting that that monitoring of buildings’ actual performance over time is crucial to the accuracy of building LCA. International Symposium on Life Cycle Assessment and Construction July 10-12, Nantes, France

[1]  Brenda Chang,et al.  Accounting for time-dependent effects in biofuel life cycle greenhouse gas emissions calculations. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Bert Bras,et al.  Improving Life Cycle Assessment by Including Spatial, Dynamic and Place-Based Modeling , 2003 .

[3]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[4]  Alex K. Jones,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment: framework and application to an institutional building , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Spatial- and time-explicit human damage modeling of ozone depleting substances in life cycle impact assessment. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[8]  Robert Ries,et al.  Uncertainty in Environmental Assessment for the Built Environment , 2003 .

[9]  Pei Zhai,et al.  Dynamic hybrid life cycle assessment of energy and carbon of multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic systems. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Ed Ayres,et al.  The Next Efficiency Revolution: Creating a Sustainable Materials Economy , 1991 .

[11]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[12]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Enabling dynamic life cycle assessment of buildings with wireless sensor networks , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[13]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  R. Ries,et al.  A characterization model with spatial and temporal resolution for life cycle impact assessment of photochemical precursors in the United States , 2009 .

[15]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[16]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[17]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .