From fAIrplay to climate wars: making climate change scenarios more dynamic, creative, and integrative
暂无分享,去创建一个
V. Aquila | L. Pereira | K. Mach | B. Beckage | C. Carlson | J. Moreno-Cruz | O. Geden | H. Buck | Andrew Jones | S. Nicholson | D. Visioni | D. Keller | C. Trisos | D. Morrow | L. Beukes | Sam Beckbesinger | Mohale Mashigo | A. Jones
[1] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Advancing a toolkit of diverse futures approaches for global environmental assessments , 2021, Ecosystems and People.
[2] H. Buhaug,et al. Security implications of climate change: A decade of scientific progress , 2021, Journal of Peace Research.
[3] T. Carter,et al. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework , 2020, Nature Climate Change.
[4] M. Moore,et al. Imagination and transformations to sustainable and just futures , 2020, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.
[5] M. Sugiyama,et al. Pandemic politics—lessons for solar geoengineering , 2020, Communications Earth & Environment.
[6] B. Glavovic,et al. Turbulent transformation: abrupt societal disruption and climate resilient development , 2020 .
[7] Baihua Fu,et al. Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.
[8] Ingemar Johansson Sevä,et al. Who do you trust? How trust in partial and impartial government institutions influences climate policy attitudes , 2020 .
[9] C. Hazlett,et al. Wildfire Exposure Increases Pro-Environment Voting within Democratic but Not Republican Areas , 2020, American Political Science Review.
[10] P. Stark,et al. Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto , 2020, Nature.
[11] G. Luderer,et al. Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement , 2020, Nature Communications.
[12] M. Hulme. One Earth, Many Futures, No Destination , 2020 .
[13] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Developing multiscale and integrative nature–people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework , 2020, People and Nature.
[14] D. MacMartin,et al. Climate econometric models indicate solar geoengineering would reduce inter-country income inequality , 2020, Nature Communications.
[15] Indra Overland,et al. The Misallocation of Climate Research Funding , 2020 .
[16] Jeffrey McGee,et al. The governance of solar geoengineering: managing climate change in the anthropocene , 2020, Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs.
[17] Sakshi Rana,et al. The voices of youth in envisioning positive futures for nature and people , 2020, Ecosystems and People.
[18] Jakob J. Kolb,et al. Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework , 2019, 1909.13697.
[19] L. Pereira,et al. Building capacities for transformative change towards sustainability: Imagination in Intergovernmental Science-Policy Scenario Processes , 2019, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.
[20] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Seeds of good anthropocenes: developing sustainability scenarios for Northern Europe , 2019, Sustainability Science.
[21] Eleonora Patacchini,et al. Hurricanes, Climate Change Policies and Electoral Accountability , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[22] N. Diffenbaugh,et al. Global warming has increased global economic inequality , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] David A. Dana,et al. Framing of Geoengineering Affects Support for Climate Change Mitigation , 2019, Environmental Communication.
[24] K. Emanuel,et al. Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards , 2019, Nature Climate Change.
[25] B. Kravitz,et al. Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[26] Rachel James,et al. Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change , 2018, Climatic Change.
[27] M. Mills,et al. CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project , 2018, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
[28] Nils Markusson,et al. Towards a cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence by negative emissions technologies (NETs) , 2018, Global Sustainability.
[29] M. Burke,et al. Estimating global agricultural effects of geoengineering using volcanic eruptions , 2018, Nature.
[30] M. Sugiyama,et al. Next steps in geoengineering scenario research: limited deployment scenarios and beyond , 2018 .
[31] P. Hebinck,et al. Imagining transformative futures: participatory foresight for food systems change , 2018 .
[32] J. Vervoort,et al. Anticipating climate futures in a 1.5 °C era: the link between foresight and governance , 2018 .
[33] Tomoko Hasegawa,et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C , 2018, Nature Climate Change.
[34] Learn to tell science stories , 2018, Nature.
[35] E. K. Smith,et al. A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries , 2018 .
[36] Rika Preiser,et al. Using futures methods to create transformative spaces: visions of a good Anthropocene in southern Africa , 2018 .
[37] Jessica Gurevitch,et al. Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[38] Ryan J. Lowe,et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene , 2018, Science.
[39] Hannu Rajaniemi,et al. Science fiction when the future is now , 2017, Nature.
[40] C. Field,et al. Toward the Next Generation of Assessment , 2017 .
[41] Henrik Österblom,et al. Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping , 2017 .
[42] Bear F. Braumoeller,et al. Food scarcity and state vulnerability: Unpacking the link between climate variability and violent unrest , 2017 .
[43] Noam Obermeister,et al. From dichotomy to duality: Addressing interdisciplinary epistemological barriers to inclusive knowledge governance in global environmental assessments , 2017 .
[44] O. Geden. The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking , 2016 .
[45] Brian C. O'Neill,et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6 , 2016 .
[46] S. Rayner. What might Evans‐Pritchard have made of two degrees? , 2016 .
[47] I. Fazey,et al. Three horizons: A pathways practice for transformation , 2016 .
[48] K. Rehdanz,et al. Knowledge about aerosol injection does not reduce individual mitigation efforts , 2016 .
[49] M. Milkoreit. The promise of climate fiction : Imagination, storytelling, and the politics of the future , 2016 .
[50] David M. Konisky,et al. Extreme weather events and climate change concern , 2015, Climatic Change.
[51] D. Morrow. Ethical aspects of the mitigation obstruction argument against climate engineering research , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[52] I. Fazey,et al. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response , 2014 .
[53] K. Caldeira,et al. Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation , 2013 .
[54] Anne Larigauderie,et al. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[55] Joshua Floyd,et al. Action research and integral futures studies: A path to embodied foresight , 2012 .
[56] Albert C. Lin. Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard? , 2012 .
[57] A. J. Masys,et al. Black swans to grey swans: revealing the uncertainty , 2012 .
[58] A. Thomson,et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .
[59] K. Taylor,et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .
[60] Ziauddin Sardar,et al. The Namesake: Futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight—What's in a name? , 2010 .
[61] M. Maslin,et al. Managing the health effects of climate change Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission , 2009, The Lancet.
[62] Andrew Curry,et al. Roads Less Travelled: Different Methods, Different Futures , 2009 .
[63] Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al. The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .
[64] V. Aquila,et al. From moral hazard to risk-response feedback , 2021, Climate Risk Management.
[65] Sara S. Metcalf,et al. Linking models of human behaviour and climate alters projected climate change , 2018, Nature Climate Change.
[66] Cullen S. Hendrix,et al. Climate change and conflict , 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.
[67] K. Sonja,et al. Building equity in: strategies for integrating equity into modelling for a 1.5°C world , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[68] J. Eom,et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .
[69] K. Riahi,et al. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .
[70] J. Shepherd,et al. The Strategic Value of Geoengineering Research , 2014 .
[71] Riel Miller,et al. Changing the conditions of change by learning to use the future differently , 2013 .
[72] Margareta Dahlström,et al. Spatial Development Trends : Nordic Countries in a European Context , 2004 .