Second level adaptation using multiple models

The concept of using multiple models to cope with transients which arise in adaptive systems with large parametric uncertainties was introduced in the 1990s. Both switching between multiple fixed models, and switching and tuning between fixed and adaptive models was proposed, and the stability of the resulting schemes was established. In all cases, the number of models needed is generally large, and the models used do not cooperate in any real sense. It was recently shown by the authors that if it is known a priori that the unknown plant parameter vector lies in the convex hull of a set of adaptive model parameter vectors at the initial time, it will remain in the convex hull of the parameters even as they evolve with time [1]. Later, a stability result was derived in [2] which decouples the stability and performance issues. In this paper, a new concept of second level adaptation is introduced to develop different stable strategies which improve the performance of the overall system. Simulation results are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme in a rapidly time-varying environment, and are shown to be far superior to existing schemes.

[1]  D. Lainiotis,et al.  Partitioning: A unifying framework for adaptive systems, I: Estimation , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Adaptive filtering prediction and control , 1984 .

[3]  D. Mayne,et al.  Design issues in adaptive control , 1988 .

[4]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  Stable Adaptive Systems , 1989 .

[5]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Multiple-model adaptive predictive control of mean arterial pressure and cardiac output , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Improving transient response of adaptive control systems using multiple models and switching , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[7]  A. Morse Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  P.S. Maybeck,et al.  Multiple model adaptive estimation applied to the LAMBDA URV for failure detection and identification , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 33rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  D. Mayne Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design [Book Review] , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  A. Morse Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers Part I. Exact matching , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  A. Morse Supervisory control of families of linear set-point controllers. 2. Robustness , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[12]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Adaptive control using multiple models , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[13]  Jovan D. Boskovic,et al.  Stable multiple model adaptive flight control for accommodation of a large class of control effector failures , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[14]  Gang Tao,et al.  Adaptive Control Design and Analysis , 2003 .

[15]  Zhuo Han,et al.  Location of models in multiple-model based adaptive control for improved performance , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[16]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Multiple adaptive models for control , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[17]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Multiple Model Adaptive Control With Mixing , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[18]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control , 2012 .