Testing a Prosthetic Haptic Feedback Simulator With an Interactive Force Matching Task

Prosthetic technology is a prime candidate for the integration of sensory feedback. Functional user testing of various haptic feedback modes is a necessary step to encourage commercial adoption. A haptic feedback simulator, using both a visual and vibrotactile representation of force, is coupled with an interactive force-matching task. This task provides an objective means to assess control of grasp force at three different target force levels. Results from eight subjects using a myoelectric prosthetic device show that visual feedback of force improved user performance at all force levels by reducing average force-matching error by 65%. Vibrotactile feedback led to improved performance in an experienced subgroup of subjects, showing 25% error reduction at the medium target force level. Furthermore, multiple practice sessions with the simulator are shown to reduce error rates. These findings suggest that prosthesis users may be able to improve their control of grasping force with a haptic feedback system. A haptic feedback simulator, such as the platform described here, will allow prosthesis users to practice with and customize the feedback to improve functionality and comfort.

[1]  Richard F. ff. Weir,et al.  CHAPTER 32 DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL ARMS AND HANDS FOR PROSTHETIC APPLICATIONS , 2005 .

[2]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Introduction to Haptics , 2001 .

[3]  R. Roeschlein,et al.  Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[4]  Abderrahmane Kheddar,et al.  Tactile interfaces: a state-of-the-art survey , 2004 .

[5]  P E Patterson,et al.  Design and evaluation of a sensory feedback system that provides grasping pressure in a myoelectric hand. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  A. Kargov,et al.  Progress in the development of a multifunctional hand prosthesis , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  G. Shannon Sensory feedback for artificial limbs. , 1979, Medical progress through technology.

[9]  G. Shannon A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Robert J. Stone,et al.  Haptic Feedback: A Brief History from Telepresence to Virtual Reality , 2000, Haptic Human-Computer Interaction.

[11]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[12]  S C Jacobsen,et al.  Extended physiologic taction: design and evaluation of a proportional force feedback system. , 1989, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[14]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Effect of Contactor Area on the Vibrotactile Threshold , 1963 .

[15]  A. A. Collins,et al.  Vibrotactile localization on the arm: Effects of place, space, and age , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  G. F. Shannon,et al.  A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses , 2006, Medical and biological engineering.

[17]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[18]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Robert W. Lindeman,et al.  A closed-loop tactor frequency control system for vibrotactile feedback , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[20]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  J M Weisenberger Sensitivity to amplitude-modulated vibrotactile signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.