The oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation and direction

Observers can better discriminate orientation or direction near the cardinal axes than near an oblique axis. We investigated whether this well-known oblique effect is determined by the physical or the perceived axis of the stimuli. Using the simultaneous tilt illusion, we generated perceptually different orientations for the same inner (target) grating by contrasting it with differently oriented outer gratings. Subjects compared the target orientation with a set of reference orientations. If orientation discriminability was determined by the physical orientations, the psychometric curves for the same target grating would be identical. Instead, all subjects produced steeper curves when perceiving target gratings near vertically as opposed to more obliquely. This result of orientation discrimination was confirmed by using adaptation-generated tilt aftereffect to manipulate the perceived orientation of a given physical orientation. Moreover, we obtained the same result in direction discrimination by using motion repulsion to alter the perceived direction of a given physical direction. We conclude that when the perceived orientation or direction differs from the physical orientation or direction, the oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation or direction. Finally, as a by-product of the study, we found that, around the vertical direction, motion repulsion is much stronger when the inducing direction is more clockwise to the test direction than when it is more counterclockwise.

[1]  F. Campbell,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  R A Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. I. Psychophysics , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[4]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[6]  A. B. Bonds.  An “oblique effect” in the visual evoked potential of the cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Ning Qian,et al.  Motion rivalry impairs motion repulsion , 2001, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Neural Basis of Orientation Perception in Primate Vision , 1974, Science.

[9]  D. W. Heeley,et al.  Meridional anisotropies of orientation discrimination for sine wave gratings , 1988, Vision Research.

[10]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions , 1988, Vision Research.

[11]  D. Levi,et al.  Meridional Anisotropy in the Discrimination of Parallel and Perpendicular Lines—Effect of Body Tilt , 1996, Perception.

[12]  S. Sherman,et al.  Receptive-field characteristics of neurons in cat striate cortex: Changes with visual field eccentricity. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  R. Freeman,et al.  Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Harris,et al.  Contrast, spatial frequency and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: Implications for underlying mechanisms , 1989, Vision Research.

[15]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon? , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Saturation of the tilt aftereffect , 1987, Vision Research.

[17]  N. Qian,et al.  Learning and adaptation in a recurrent model of V1 orientation selectivity. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Overrepresentation of horizontal and vertical orientation preferences in developing ferret area 17. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Appelle.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat straite cortex. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  B. L. Gros,et al.  Anisotropies in visual motion perception: a fresh look. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  Direction repulsion in motion transparency , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  Yu Hb,et al.  The oblique effect revealed by optical imaging in primary visual cortex of cats , 2000 .

[25]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  C. Blakemore,et al.  An analysis of orientation selectivity in the cat's visual cortex , 1974, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Ko Sakai,et al.  Functional Roles of Receptive Field Structures in the Perception of Orientation , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[28]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Human Discrimination of the Implicit Orientation of Simple Symmetrical Patterns , 1997, Vision Research.

[29]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[30]  S Thorpe,et al.  Modulation of neural stereoscopic processing in primate area V1 by the viewing distance. , 1992, Science.

[31]  C. Gilbert.  Adult cortical dynamics. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[32]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[33]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[34]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Unequal representation of cardinal and oblique contours in ferret visual cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  T. Shou,et al.  [The oblique effect revealed by optical imaging in primary visual cortex of cats]. , 2000, Sheng li xue bao : [Acta physiologica Sinica].

[36]  R. Andersen,et al.  The Contributions of Vestibular Signals to the Representations of Space in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Edouard Gentaz,et al.  Body tilt effect on the reproduction of orientations: studies on the visual oblique effect and subjective orientations. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects , 1984, Vision Research.

[39]  B. Finlay,et al.  Meridional differences in orientation sensitivity in monkey striate cortex , 1976, Brain Research.

[40]  D W Heeley,et al.  Anisotropic Axes in Orientation Perception are Not Retinotopically Mapped , 1993, Perception.

[41]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  S. Celebrini,et al.  Gaze direction controls response gain in primary visual-cortex neurons , 1999, Nature.

[43]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[44]  G. Orban,et al.  Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns , 1988, Vision Research.

[45]  S. Ronner,et al.  Orientation anisotropy in monkey visual cortex , 1978, Brain Research.

[46]  C. Clifford,et al.  Interaction between first- and second-order orientation channels revealed by the tilt illusion: psychophysics and computational modelling , 2001, Vision Research.

[47]  R. Andersen,et al.  Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Orientation anisotropy in vernier acuity , 1995, Vision Research.

[49]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.