IONS OCCURRING IN MUSIC RECOGNITION Simultaneous Interval Recognition and Transposition The unit of the musical scale as conventionally defined is the semitone. When two tones are played simultaneously we are able to tell how many semitones they are apart independently of the absolute pitch of the component tones. Thus, two tones three semitones apart constitute a minor third, four semitones apart constitute a major third, and seven semitones constitute a fifth. In physical terms, since the musical scale of pitch stands in logarithmic relationship to the frequency scale, intervals appear identical if they stand in the same physical ratios to each other. An octave is produced by the physical ratio 1 : 2, a fifth by the ratio 2 : 3, and so on. Thus equal frequency ratios appear as equal intervals. Chord Recognition and Transposition Just as with intervals, we are able to classify simultaneous combinations of more than two tones, independently of their component frequencies. For instance a combination of three tones of which the lowest and middle are four semitones apart, and the middle and the highest three semitones apart is known as the root form of the major triad. It might be thought that chord recognition follows logically from interval recognition; however, it can be shown that abstraction of all the intervals involved in a chord does not uniquely define the chord. Consider, for instance, the root forms of the major and minor triads. As shown in Figure 1 they are both composed of a major third, a minor third, and a fifth. However, they sound quite different. Thus the problem of how we abstract chords is not solved by the knowledge of how we abstract intervals. Tune Recognition and Transposition A tune is a series of successive intervals. When two tones are played successively, we are able to tell how far apart they are from each other on the musical scale, independently of their absolute pitch (in physical terms, we abstract their ratios independently of their absolute frequencies). This process of abstraction is so fundamental that it is easier for us to remember a tune than it is to remember the absolute pitch of the component tones. We transpose tunes so readily that it is extremely difficult for us not to do so. Tune recognition is more complicated than simultaneous interval abstraction because it involves recognition of the time order in which the two components of the interval occurred. For instance all three intervals in Figure 2 sound different although their component frequencies are identical. Recognition and Transposition of Sequences of Chords It follows from the transposability of harmonic sequences that we abstract successive relationships not only between tones played separately, but also between simultaneous combinations of tones. Such successive relationships may however be defined by specifying all the abstracted successive intervals involved. For illustra-
[1]
THE AESTHETIC APPRECIATION OF MUSICAL INTERVALS AMONG SCHOOL CHILDREN AND ADULTS
,
1913
.
[2]
The Pitch of a Combination of Tones
,
1938
.
[3]
L. Humphreys.
Generalization as a function of method of reinforcement.
,
1939
.
[4]
Karl D. Kryter,et al.
Studies on the Function of the Higher Acoustic Nervous Centers in the Cat
,
1943
.
[5]
H. Schlosberg,et al.
Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat.
,
1943
.
[6]
M. Rosenzweig.
Discrimination of auditory intensities in the cat.
,
1946,
The American journal of psychology.
[7]
D. Raab,et al.
Cortical and midbrain mediation of a conditioned discrimination of acoustic intensities.
,
1946,
The American journal of psychology.
[8]
W. Pitts,et al.
How we know universals; the perception of auditory and visual forms.
,
1947,
The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.
[9]
D R MEYER,et al.
Effects of localized cortical destruction on auditory discriminative conditioning in cat.
,
1952,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[10]
W. D. Neff,et al.
Role of auditory cortex in discrimination of changes in frequency.
,
1957,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[11]
W. D. Neff,et al.
Ablation of temporal cortex and discrimination of auditory patterns.
,
1957,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[12]
D. Broadbent.
Perception and communication
,
1958
.
[13]
W. D. Neff,et al.
Frequency discrimination after bilateral ablation of cortical auditory areas.
,
1961,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[14]
Paul C. Boomsliter,et al.
The Long Pattern Hypothesis in Harmony and Hearing
,
1961
.
[15]
D. Hubel,et al.
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex
,
1962,
The Journal of physiology.
[16]
J. Deutsch,et al.
Attention: Some theoretical considerations.
,
1963
.
[17]
J. H. Dewson,et al.
Speech Sound Discrimination by Cats
,
1964,
Science.
[18]
I. Whitfield,et al.
Classification of unit responses in the auditory cortex of the unanaesthetized and unrestrained cat
,
1964,
The Journal of physiology.
[19]
I. Whitfield,et al.
RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY.
,
1965,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[20]
Shinjiro Oonishi,et al.
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION AND INTEGRATIVE MECHANISM ON THE AUDITORY CORTEX OF THE CAT
,
1965
.
[21]
N Suga,et al.
Functional properties of auditory neurones in the cortex of echo‐locating bats.
,
1965,
The Journal of physiology.
[22]
J. R. Trotter.
The psychophysics of melodic interval: Definitions, techniques, theory and problems
,
1967
.
[23]
David Allen,et al.
Octave discriminability of musical and non-musical subjects
,
1967
.
[24]
J. Goldberg,et al.
Nervous system: afferent mechanisms.
,
1968,
Annual review of physiology.
[25]
Paul R. Lehman.
Tests of Musical Ability and Appreciation
,
1970
.