Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge [Learning and Instruction 10 (2000) 311–330]

In this article we present the results of an experimental study of the influence of task characteristics on the characteristics of elaboration of conceptual knowledge in social interaction. With a pre-test and post-test we measured individual learning outcomes. We constructed a coding scheme that focuses on the communicative functions and propositional content of utterances and on elaborative episodes. The subjects were 40 students who worked in dyads on a collaborative task about electricity in one of four conditions. We compared a concept mapping task with a poster task and investigated the effect of a phase of individual preparation. The post-test scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores. Individual preparation created better learning results and the asking of more questions. The concept mapping conditions showed more discussion of electricity concepts, collaboratively elaborated conflicts and reasoning, but no higher individual learning outcomes. In the concept mapping conditions, elaboration was related to individual learning outcomes.  2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Pursuing Scientific Literacy in the Middle Grades Through Collaborative Problem Solving , 1993, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  The Productive Agency that Drives Collaborative Learning , 1998 .

[3]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative construction of conceptual understanding: interaction processes and learning outcomes emerging from a concept mapping and a poster task , 1997 .

[4]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[5]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[6]  N. Mercer.  The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom , 1996, Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge.

[7]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[8]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[9]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[10]  William Damon,et al.  Problems of direction in socially shared cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[11]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[12]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Conscription Device and Tool for Social Thinking in High School Science. , 1992 .

[13]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[14]  B. Rogoff.  Cognition as a collaborative process. , 1998 .

[15]  G. Salomon,et al.  When teams do not function the way they ought to , 1989 .

[16]  Wolfgang Schnotz,et al.  Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change , 1997 .

[17]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks , 1999 .

[18]  Ola Halldén,et al.  Re-framing the problem of conceptual change , 1994 .

[19]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Question Asking During Tutoring and in the Design of Educational Software , 2020 .

[20]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[21]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher , 1994 .

[22]  Roger Osborne,et al.  Towards Modifying Children's Ideas about Electric Current , 1983 .