Mind Games: Game Engines as an Architecture for Intuitive Physics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Noah D. Goodman,et al. Learning physical parameters from dynamic scenes , 2018, Cognitive Psychology.
[2] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. A Compositional Object-Based Approach to Learning Physical Dynamics , 2016, ICLR.
[3] Misha Denil,et al. Learning to Perform Physics Experiments via Deep Reinforcement Learning , 2016, ICLR.
[4] Razvan Pascanu,et al. Interaction Networks for Learning about Objects, Relations and Physics , 2016, NIPS.
[5] Jessica B. Hamrick,et al. Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation , 2016, Cognition.
[6] John G. Mikhael,et al. Functional neuroanatomy of intuitive physical inference , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[7] Jitendra Malik,et al. Learning to Poke by Poking: Experiential Learning of Intuitive Physics , 2016, NIPS.
[8] Sergey Levine,et al. Unsupervised Learning for Physical Interaction through Video Prediction , 2016, NIPS.
[9] Jiajun Wu,et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Approximate Probabilistic Simulation and Deep Neural Networks as Accounts of Human Physical Scene Understanding , 2016, CogSci.
[10] Marcel Adam Just,et al. Neural Representations of Physics Concepts , 2016, Psychological science.
[11] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Building machines that learn and think like people , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[12] Ali Farhadi,et al. "What Happens If..." Learning to Predict the Effect of Forces in Images , 2016, ECCV.
[13] Rob Fergus,et al. Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Example , 2016, ICML.
[14] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Five-Month-Old Infants Have General Knowledge of How Nonsolid Substances Behave and Interact , 2016, Psychological science.
[15] Jitendra Malik,et al. Learning Visual Predictive Models of Physics for Playing Billiards , 2015, ICLR.
[16] Ali Farhadi,et al. Newtonian Image Understanding: Unfolding the Dynamics of Objects in Static Images , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[17] Jiajun Wu,et al. Galileo: Perceiving Physical Object Properties by Integrating a Physics Engine with Deep Learning , 2015, NIPS.
[18] Charles Kemp,et al. Evaluating the inverse reasoning account of object discovery , 2015, Cognition.
[19] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.
[20] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Divisions of the physical world: Concepts of objects and substances. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.
[21] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Humans predict liquid dynamics using probabilistic simulation , 2015, CogSci.
[22] Jessica B. Hamrick,et al. Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] E. Davis,et al. How Robust Are Probabilistic Models of Higher-Level Cognition? , 2013, Psychological science.
[24] Hannah E Smithson,et al. Different aberrations raise contrast thresholds for single-letter identification in line with their effect on cross-correlation-based confusability. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[25] Manish Singh,et al. Visual perception of the physical stability of asymmetric three-dimensional objects. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[26] Vikash K. Mansinghka,et al. Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. , 2013, Psychological review.
[27] Abraham Z. Snyder,et al. fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domains , 2013, NeuroImage.
[28] Kevin A. Smith,et al. Consistent physics underlying ballistic motion prediction , 2013, CogSci.
[29] Jennifer M. Zosh,et al. Memory load affects object individuation in 18-month-old infants. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[30] Noah D. Goodman,et al. Theory learning as stochastic search in the language of thought , 2012 .
[31] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Infants make quantity discriminations for substances. , 2012, Child development.
[32] Audrey K. Kittredge,et al. Object Individuation and Physical Reasoning in Infancy: An Integrative Account , 2012, Language learning and development : the official journal of the Society for Language Development.
[33] Kevin A. Smith,et al. Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics , 2012, CogSci.
[34] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. Noisy Newtons: Unifying process and dependency accounts of causal attribution , 2012, CogSci.
[35] Edward Vul,et al. Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference , 2011, Science.
[36] Karen Wynn,et al. Tracking and quantifying objects and non-cohesive substances. , 2011, Developmental science.
[37] Sang Ah Lee,et al. Two systems of spatial representation underlying navigation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[38] Louise P. Kirsch,et al. Information about the Weight of Grasped Objects from Vision and Internal Models Interacts within the Primary Motor Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[39] Jason Gregory,et al. Game Engine Architecture , 2009 .
[40] Susan J. Hespos,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Five-Month-Old Infants Have Different Expectations for Solids and Liquids , 2022 .
[41] M. Goodale,et al. Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[42] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. The Recurrent Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machine , 2008, NIPS.
[43] Sang Ah Lee,et al. Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.
[44] Renée Baillargeon,et al. Can infants be “taught” to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.
[45] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Perception and prediction of simple object interactions , 2007, APGV.
[46] Irene Leo,et al. Perceptual completion in newborn human infants. , 2006, Child development.
[47] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Décalage in infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: Converging evidence from action tasks , 2006, Cognition.
[48] Fei Xu. Categories , Kinds , and Object Individuation in Infancy , 2006 .
[49] P. White. The causal asymmetry. , 2006, Psychological review.
[50] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Conceptual precursors to language , 2004, Nature.
[51] R. Baillargeon. Infants' Physical World , 2004 .
[52] M. Hegarty. Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[53] J. Deloache,et al. Young Infants ' Reasoning about the Physical and Spatial Properties of a Hidden Object , 2004 .
[54] Susan Carey,et al. Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants' representations of small groups of discrete entities , 2002, Cognition.
[55] Susan J. Hespos,et al. Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.
[56] R. Baillargeon,et al. Reasoning about collisions involving inert objects in 7.5-month-old infants , 2000 .
[57] Henrik Olsson,et al. Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.
[58] S. Carey. The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .
[59] E. Spelke,et al. Perception and understanding of effects of gravity and inertia on object motion , 1999 .
[60] S. Carey,et al. Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.
[61] E. Spelke,et al. Spatiotemporal continuity, smoothness of motion and object identity in infancy , 1995 .
[62] D. Proffitt,et al. Heuristic judgment of mass ratio in two-body collisions , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[63] R. Baillargeon,et al. Calibration-based reasoning about collision events in 11-month-old infants , 1994, Cognition.
[64] E. Spelke,et al. Gestalt Relations and Object Perception: A Developmental Study , 1993, Perception.
[65] E. Spelke,et al. Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.
[66] D. Shanks,et al. Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[67] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[68] H. Hecht,et al. Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[69] D. Proffitt,et al. Understanding wheel dynamics , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.
[70] Johan de Kleer,et al. Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems , 1990 .
[71] Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al. Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[72] Benjamin J. Kaipers,et al. Qualitative Simulation , 1989, Artif. Intell..
[73] D R Proffitt,et al. Understanding collision dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[74] Kenneth D. Forbus. Qualitative physics: past present and future , 1988 .
[75] A. Leslie,et al. Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.
[76] B. Kuipers. Qualitative Simulation , 1986, Artif. Intell..
[77] E. Spelke,et al. Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.
[78] J. Clement. Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .
[79] Kenneth D. Forbus. Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Processes , 1981, IJCAI.
[80] A. Caramazza,et al. Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.
[81] David N. Lee. 16 Visuo-Motor Coordination in Space-Time , 1980 .
[82] David N. Lee,et al. Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants , 1974 .
[83] R. C. Oldfield. THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .
[84] W. H. F. Barnes. The Nature of Explanation , 1944, Nature.
[85] L. Frank. The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .