What do cMOOC participants talk about in social media?: a topic analysis of discourse in a cMOOC

Creating meaning from a wide variety of available information and being able to choose what to learn are highly relevant skills for learning in a connectivist setting. In this work, various approaches have been utilized to gain insights into learning processes occurring within a network of learners and understand the factors that shape learners' interests and the topics to which learners devote a significant attention. This study combines different methods to develop a scalable analytic approach for a comprehensive analysis of learners' discourse in a connectivist massive open online course (cMOOC). By linking techniques for semantic annotation and graph analysis with a qualitative analysis of learner-generated discourse, we examined how social media platforms (blogs, Twitter, and Facebook) and course recommendations influence content creation and topics discussed within a cMOOC. Our findings indicate that learners tend to focus on several prominent topics that emerge very quickly in the course. They maintain that focus, with some exceptions, throughout the course, regardless of readings suggested by the instructor. Moreover, the topics discussed across different social media differ, which can likely be attributed to the affordances of different media. Finally, our results indicate a relatively low level of cohesion in the topics discussed which might be an indicator of a diversity of the conceptual coverage discussed by the course participants.

[1]  Massimiliano Ciaramita,et al.  A framework for benchmarking entity-annotation systems , 2013, WWW.

[2]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[3]  Lei Yang,et al.  We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption? , 2012, WWW.

[4]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2004, Graph Drawing Software.

[5]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Linguistic Reflections of Student Engagement in Massive Open Online Courses , 2014, ICWSM.

[6]  George Siemens,et al.  Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative , 2014 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Coh-Metrix , 2011 .

[8]  Kerry Cook,et al.  Networked Learning , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[9]  Catherine A. Bliss,et al.  cMOOCs and Global Learning: An Authentic Alternative. , 2013 .

[10]  Sir John Daniel Foreword to the Special Section on Massive Open Online Courses MOOCs - Evolution or Revolution? , 2014 .

[11]  Richard F. Schmid,et al.  The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Antonio Fini,et al.  The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools , 2009 .

[13]  C. Sinclair,et al.  Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy , 2014 .

[14]  Amal Zouaq,et al.  An Assessment of Online Semantic Annotators for the Keyword Extraction Task , 2014, PRICAI.

[15]  Denise Whitelock,et al.  Designing and testing visual representations of draft essays for higher education students , 2014 .

[16]  Natalie Schluter Centrality Measures for Non-Contextual Graph-Based Unsupervised Single Document Keyword Extraction , 2014, TALN.

[17]  Vivien Hodgson,et al.  Advances in Research on Networked Learning , 2011 .

[18]  Jinho Kim,et al.  Social Network Community Detection Using Strongly Connected Components , 2014, PAKDD Workshops.

[19]  Roy Williams,et al.  The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC , 2010, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[20]  Rita Kop,et al.  The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course , 2011 .

[21]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Roles of Course Facilitators, Learners, and Technology in the Flow of Information of a CMOOC , 2015 .

[22]  Florian Boudin,et al.  A Comparison of Centrality Measures for Graph-Based Keyphrase Extraction , 2013, IJCNLP.

[23]  Guillaume Durand,et al.  Challenges to Research in MOOCs , 2014 .

[24]  Hélène Fournier,et al.  The value of learning analytics to networked learning on a personal learning environment , 2011, LAK.

[25]  Roy Williams,et al.  Blogs and forums as communication and learning tools in a MOOC , 2010 .

[26]  Anna-Lan Huang,et al.  Similarity Measures for Text Document Clustering , 2008 .

[27]  George Siemens,et al.  What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[28]  Helene Fournier,et al.  A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses , 2011 .

[29]  George Siemens Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime of the Self-Amused? , 2006 .

[30]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Peter Goodyear Advances in Research on Networked Learning (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, V. 4) , 2004 .

[32]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[33]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[34]  Kristiina Kumpulainen,et al.  Participants' Perceptions of Learning and Networking in Connectivist MOOCs , 2014 .

[35]  B. Wellman,et al.  Imagining Twitter as an Imagined Community , 2011 .

[36]  Jen Ross,et al.  The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): the UK view , 2014 .

[37]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[38]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Automated Semantic Tagging of Textual Content , 2014, IT Professional.