Integrated Guidance and Control of UAVs for Reactive Collision Avoidance

Abstract : Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) employed in low altitude flights are liable to collide with urban structures. The present work focuses on the reactive obstacle avoidance problem for unaccountable obstacles like urban edifices, poles, etc. Unlike existing literature that mainly proposes avoidance maneuvers using kinematic and point mass models, an innovative Six-Degree of Freedom model based partial integrated guidance and control (PIGC) approach was used. PIGC performs the avoidance maneuver in the cascaded two loop structure to overcome IGC approach shortcomings, and reduces the delay in multiple loop tracking. The PIGC Six-DOF model uses nonlinear dynamic inversion technique, is computationally inexpensive, and can be implemented on onboard UAV microcomputers. A robustness study for large numbers of simulations was performed by randomly perturbing coefficients and inertia terms and clearly shows that the neuro-adaptive augmented PIGC design is more robust to parameter perturbations compared to nominal control when applied to the perturbed plant model. In all simulations, all constraints posed by the vehicle capability are very well met within the available time-to-go.

[1]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Automatic path planning and control design for autonomous landing of UAVs using dynamic inversion , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[2]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Obstacle avoidance in a dynamic environment: a collision cone approach , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[3]  Shashiprakash Singh Autonomous Landing Of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2009 .

[4]  K. Bilimoria A Geometric Optimization Approach to Aircraft Conflict Resolution , 2000 .

[5]  D. Hull Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics , 2007 .

[6]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Reactive Obstacle Avoidance of UAVs with Dynamic Inversion Based Partial Integrated Guidance and Control , 2010 .

[7]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[8]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Model-following neuro-adaptive control design for non-square, non-affine nonlinear systems , 2007 .

[9]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Model-following Neuro-adaptive approach for robust control of high performance aircrafts , 2007 .

[10]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Combined optic-flow and stereo-based navigation of urban canyons for a UAV , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[11]  Dan Bugajski,et al.  Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design , 1994 .

[12]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Robust nonlinear flight control of a high-performance aircraft , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Hyochoong Bang,et al.  Proportional navigation-based collision avoidance for UAVs , 2009 .

[14]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Efficient Two-phase 3D Motion Planning for Small Fixed-wing UAVs , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Ming Xin,et al.  Nonlinear Missile Autopilot Design with theta - D Technique , 2004 .

[16]  S. Sastry,et al.  Autonomous Exploration in Unknown Urban Environments for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2005 .

[17]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Minimum-Effort Guidance for Vision-Based Collision Avoidance , 2006 .

[18]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Aircraft Control and Simulation , 1992 .

[19]  Mangal Kothari,et al.  An optimal dynamic inversion-based neuro-adaptive approach for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[20]  Steven M. LaValle,et al.  Rapidly-Exploring Random Trees: Progress and Prospects , 2000 .

[21]  U. Ciniglio,et al.  A Novel 3D Geometric Algorithm for Aircraft Autonomous Collision Avoidance , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Chuen-Ming Chen,et al.  Aiming point guidance law for air-to-air missiles , 1998, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[23]  Sebastian Scherer,et al.  Flying Fast and Low Among Obstacles: Methodology and Experiments , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[24]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Partial integrated guidance and control of surface-to-air interceptors for high speed targets , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[25]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  IMPLEMENTATION OF PILOT COMMANDS IN AIRCRAFT CONTROL: A NEW APPROACH BASED ON DYNAMIC INVERSION , 2003 .

[26]  Min-Jea Tahk,et al.  UAV collision avoidance based on geometric approach , 2008, 2008 SICE Annual Conference.

[27]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Robust Partial Integrated Guidance and Control of Interceptors in Terminal Phase , 2009 .

[28]  Timothy W. McLain,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technologies for Small Fixed Wing UAVs , 2003 .

[29]  Ming Xin,et al.  Integrated Guidance and Control of Missiles with Θ-D Method , 2004 .

[30]  Radhakant Padhi,et al.  Nonlinear Geometric and Differential Geometric Guidance of UAVs for Reactive Collision Avoidance , 2010 .

[31]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[32]  D. J. East,et al.  Missile Guidance and Pursuit: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control, N.A. Shneydor, Horwood Publishing, Coll House, Westergate, Chichester, West Sussex PO20 6QL, UK. 1998. 259pp. Illustrated. £30. , 1998, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).