Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin

Highly impaired stroke patients at early stages of recovery are unable to generate enough muscle force to lift the weight of their own arm. Accordingly, task-related training is strongly limited or even impossible. However, as soon as partial or full arm weight support is provided, patients are enabled to perform arm rehabilitation training again throughout an increased workspace. In the literature, the current solutions for providing arm weight support are mostly mechanical. These systems have components that restrict the freedom of movement or entail additional disturbances. A scalable weight compensation for upper and lower arm that is online adjustable as well as generalizable to any robotic system is necessary. In this paper, a model-based feedforward weight compensation of upper and lower arm fulfilling these requirements is introduced. The proposed method is tested with the upper extremity rehabilitation robot ARMin V, but can be applied in any other actuated exoskeleton system. Experimental results were verified using EMG measurements. These results revealed that the proposed weight compensation reduces the effort of the subjects to 26% on average and more importantly throughout the entire workspace of the robot.

[1]  M. Bergamasco,et al.  Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleleton in Virtual Reality , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  V. Dietz,et al.  Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  A.H.A. Stienen,et al.  Freebal: dedicated gravity compensation for the upper extremities , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[4]  Catherine E Lang,et al.  Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. , 2009, Stroke.

[5]  T.M. Sukal,et al.  Dynamic characterization of upper limb discoordination following hemiparetic stroke , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[6]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Freebal: Design of a Dedicated Weight-Support System for Upper-Extremity Rehabilitation , 2009 .

[8]  Jules P. A. Dewald,et al.  Impairment-Based 3-D Robotic Intervention Improves Upper Extremity Work Area in Chronic Stroke: Targeting Abnormal Joint Torque Coupling With Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  Julius P. A. Dewald,et al.  Robotic quantification of upper extremity loss of independent joint control or flexion synergy in individuals with hemiparetic stroke: a review of paradigms addressing the effects of shoulder abduction loading , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[10]  Scott L. Delp,et al.  A Model of the Upper Extremity for Simulating Musculoskeletal Surgery and Analyzing Neuromuscular Control , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Jiping He,et al.  Design and Control of RUPERT: A Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[13]  R DRILLIS,et al.  BODY SEGMENT PARAMETERS; A SURVEY OF MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES. , 1964, Artificial limbs.

[14]  J. Dewald,et al.  Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[16]  P. Feys,et al.  The Armeo Spring as training tool to improve upper limb functionality in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[17]  G. Kramer,et al.  Design of a Dynamic Arm Support (DAS) for gravity compensation , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[18]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[20]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[22]  Dar-Zen Chen,et al.  A theoretical study of weight-balanced mechanisms for design of spring assistive mobile arm support (MAS) , 2013 .

[23]  D. Bourbonnais,et al.  Weakness in patients with hemiparesis. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[24]  Thomas Schauer,et al.  Adaptive Arm Weight Support Using a Cable-Driven Robotic System , 2017 .

[25]  Robert Riener,et al.  Online adaptive compensation of the ARMin Rehabilitation Robot , 2016, 2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[26]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.