Overview of Materials Qualification Needs for Metal Additive Manufacturing

This overview highlights some of the key aspects regarding materials qualification needs across the additive manufacturing (AM) spectrum. AM technology has experienced considerable publicity and growth in the past few years with many successful insertions for non-mission-critical applications. However, to meet the full potential that AM has to offer, especially for flight-critical components (e.g., rotating parts, fracture-critical parts, etc.), qualification and certification efforts are necessary. While development of qualification standards will address some of these needs, this overview outlines some of the other key areas that will need to be considered in the qualification path, including various process-, microstructure-, and fracture-modeling activities in addition to integrating these with lifing activities targeting specific components. Ongoing work in the Advanced Manufacturing and Mechanical Reliability Center at Case Western Reserve University is focusing on fracture and fatigue testing to rapidly assess critical mechanical properties of some titanium alloys before and after post-processing, in addition to conducting nondestructive testing/evaluation using micro-computerized tomography at General Electric. Process mapping studies are being conducted at Carnegie Mellon University while large area microstructure characterization and informatics (EBSD and BSE) analyses are being conducted at Materials Resources LLC to enable future integration of these efforts via an Integrated Computational Materials Engineering approach to AM. Possible future pathways for materials qualification are provided.

[1]  B. Stucker,et al.  Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Ti6Al4V Parts Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting , 2013, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[2]  Timothy P. Quinn,et al.  Effects of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated using electron beam melting (EBM), Part 2: Energy input, orientation, and location , 2013 .

[3]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Workflow for integrating mesoscale heterogeneities in materials structure with process simulation of titanium alloys , 2014, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation.

[4]  Harry R. Millwater,et al.  Probabilistic methods for design assessment of reliability with inspection , 2002 .

[5]  Chandrika Kamath,et al.  Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[6]  Eric R. Burke,et al.  Nondestructive Evaluation of Additive Manufacturing State-of-the-Discipline Report , 2014 .

[7]  S. Bontha,et al.  The Effect of Process Variables on Microstructure in Laser-Deposited Materials , 2006 .

[8]  William E. Frazier,et al.  Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review , 2014, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[9]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  The laser additive manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V , 2001 .

[10]  Tobias Melz,et al.  Uncertainty of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V: Chemistry, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties , 2015 .

[11]  Krishna Rajan,et al.  Materials Informatics: The Materials ``Gene'' and Big Data , 2015 .

[12]  Surya R. Kalidindi,et al.  Materials Data Science: Current Status and Future Outlook , 2015 .

[13]  Lonnie J. Love,et al.  Additive manufacturing of materials: Opportunities and challenges , 2015 .

[14]  Tim Caffrey,et al.  Wohlers report 2013 : additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry : annual worldwide progress report , 2013 .

[15]  Karen M. Taminger,et al.  Integrated control of solidification microstructure and melt pool dimensions in electron beam wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V , 2014 .

[16]  William E. Frazier,et al.  Qualifying of metallic materials and structures for aerospace applications , 2001 .

[17]  A. A. Salem,et al.  Variant Selection During Cooling after Beta Annealing of Ti-6Al-4V Ingot Material , 2012, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[18]  David W. Rosen,et al.  A Brief History of Additive Manufacturing and the 2009 Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing: Looking Back and Looking Ahead , 2009 .

[19]  Shawn P. Moylan,et al.  Applicability of Existing Materials Testing Standards for Additive Manufacturing Materials , 2014 .

[20]  Charles H. Ward Materials Genome Initiative for Global Competitiveness , 2012 .

[21]  Shawn P. Moylan,et al.  Mechanical Properties Testing for Metal Parts Made via Additive Manufacturing: A Review of the State of the Art of Mechanical Property Testing , 2012 .

[22]  H. Fraser,et al.  Laser deposition of compositionally graded titanium–vanadium and titanium–molybdenum alloys , 2003 .

[23]  C. Kamath,et al.  Overview of modelling and simulation of metal powder bed fusion process at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory , 2015 .

[24]  Mohsen Seifi,et al.  Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Mechanical Properties , 2016 .

[25]  John J. Lewandowski,et al.  Evaluation of Orientation Dependence of Fracture Toughness and Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of As-Deposited ARCAM EBM Ti-6Al-4V , 2015 .