On the distinguishability of HRF models in fMRI

The problem of model falsification or model invalidation appears in several areas where we are interested in distinguishing among an eligible set of dynamic systems. In the context of fMRI studies of brain activity, modeling the haemodynamic response function (HRF) is a critical step. The estimation of the dynamic system describing a biophysical model of the HRF may leave much uncertainty on the exact values of the parameters. Moreover, the high noise levels in the data may hinder the model identification task. Therefore, this paper proposes a systematic tool to address the problem of the distinguishability among a set of physiologically plausible HRF models. The concept of absolutely input distinguishable systems is introduced and applied to the HRF model, by exploiting the structure of the underlying nonlinear dynamic system. A strategy to model uncertainty in the input time delay and magnitude is developed and its impact on the distinguishability of two physiologically plausible HRF models is determined, in terms of the maximum noise amplitude above which it is not possible to guarantee the falsification of one model in relation to the other. Finally, a methodology is proposed for the choice of the input sequence, or experimental paradigm, that should be used in order to maximize the distinguishability of the HRF models under investigation. The proposed approach may be used to assess the performance of HRF model identification techniques from fMRI data.

[1]  Keith Glover,et al.  Identifiability of Linear and Nonlinear , 1976 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Estimating efficiency a priori: a comparison of blocked and randomized designs , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  C Silvestre,et al.  On the distinguishability of HRF models in fMRI. , 2010, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.

[5]  Olivier Faugeras,et al.  Using nonlinear models in fMRI data analysis: Model selection and activation detection , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[7]  Eric Walter,et al.  On the structural output distinguishability of parametric models, and its relations with structural identifiability , 1984 .

[8]  G. Deco,et al.  Ongoing Cortical Activity at Rest: Criticality, Multistability, and Ghost Attractors , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  S. Petersen,et al.  Characterizing the Hemodynamic Response: Effects of Presentation Rate, Sampling Procedure, and the Possibility of Ordering Brain Activity Based on Relative Timing , 2000, NeuroImage.

[13]  Carlos Silvestre,et al.  On the distinguishability of discrete linear time-invariant dynamic systems , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[14]  Naoki Miura,et al.  A state-space model of the hemodynamic approach: nonlinear filtering of BOLD signals , 2004, NeuroImage.

[15]  João Jorge,et al.  EEG–fMRI integration for the study of human brain function , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Caffeine alters the temporal dynamics of the visual BOLD response , 2004, NeuroImage.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  K. Glover,et al.  Identifiability of linear and nonlinear dynamical systems , 1976 .

[19]  C. Silvestre,et al.  Multiple-Model Set-Valued Observers: A new tool for HRF model selection in fMRI , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  DEM: A variational treatment of dynamic systems , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  L Bru Villaseca,et al.  [The dynamics of blood flow]. , 1984, Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[23]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: Efficiency, bias and mis-modeling , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  Efficient Design of Event-Related fMRI Experiments Using M-Sequences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  J Riera,et al.  Fusing EEG and fMRI based on a bottom-up model: inferring activation and effective connectivity in neural masses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: a general framework using a genetic algorithm , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  C. Iadecola Neurovascular regulation in the normal brain and in Alzheimer's disease , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Constrained linear basis sets for HRF modelling using Variational Bayes , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The continuing challenge of understanding and modeling hemodynamic variation in fMRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Iven M. Y. Mareels,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of the BOLD signal , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  D. Chialvo,et al.  Spontaneous BOLD event triggered averages for estimating functional connectivity at resting state , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Understanding neural system dynamics through task modulation and measurement of functional MRI amplitude, latency, and width , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Effect of Basal Conditions on the Magnitude and Dynamics of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent fMRI Response , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[37]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  R. Goebel,et al.  Optimal design for nonlinear estimation of the hemodynamic response function , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[39]  R. Turner,et al.  Event-Related fMRI: Characterizing Differential Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[41]  J. Lewin Functional MRI: An introduction to methods , 2003 .

[42]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Variability of Human, BOLD Hemodynamic Responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Lindquist,et al.  Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: A comparison study and a new approach , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Nicholas G Martin,et al.  Modeling of the Hemodynamic Responses in Block Design fMRI Studies , 2014, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[45]  C. Segebarth,et al.  Identifying Neural Drivers with Functional MRI: An Electrophysiological Validation , 2008, PLoS biology.

[46]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[47]  R. Buxton,et al.  Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[50]  R. Buxton,et al.  Detection Power, Estimation Efficiency, and Predictability in Event-Related fMRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[51]  Laurent Risser,et al.  Flexible multivariate hemodynamics fMRI data analyses and simulations with PyHRF , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[52]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  Identification and comparison of stochastic metabolic/hemodynamic models (sMHM) for the generation of the BOLD signal , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[53]  Guorong Wu,et al.  A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[54]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related FMRI with multiple trial types Part I: theory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[55]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  Modelling the role of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity in the generation of the BOLD signal , 2007, NeuroImage.

[56]  David A. Boas,et al.  A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans , 2006, NeuroImage.

[57]  Marta I. Garrido,et al.  Dynamic Causal Modelling of epileptic seizure propagation pathways: A combined EEG–fMRI study , 2012, NeuroImage.