A Meta-Learning Approach to the Optimal Power Flow Problem Under Topology Reconfigurations

Recently there has been a surge of interest in adopting deep neural networks (DNNs) for solving the optimal power flow (OPF) problem in power systems. Computing optimal generation dispatch decisions using a trained DNN takes significantly less time when compared to conventional optimization solvers. However, a major drawback of existing work is that the machine learning models are trained for a specific system topology. Hence, the DNN predictions are only useful as long as the system topology remains unchanged. Changes to the system topology (initiated by the system operator) would require retraining the DNN, which incurs significant training overhead and requires an extensive amount of training data (corresponding to the new system topology). To overcome this drawback, we propose a DNNbased OPF predictor that is trained using a meta-learning (MTL) approach. The key idea behind this approach is to find a common initialization vector that enables fast training for any system topology. The developed OPF-predictor is validated through simulations using benchmark IEEE bus systems. The results show that the MTL approach achieves significant training speeds-ups and requires only a few gradient steps with a few data samples to achieve high OPF prediction accuracy and outperforms other pretraining techniques.

[1]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  Robust Corrective Topology Control for System Reliability , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Spyros Chatzivasileiadis,et al.  Verification of Neural Network Behaviour: Formal Guarantees for Power System Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Guannan Qu,et al.  Learning Optimal Power Flow: Worst-Case Guarantees for Neural Networks , 2020, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[4]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Chance-Constrained Outage Scheduling Using a Machine Learning Proxy , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Moving-Target Defense for Detecting Coordinated Cyber-Physical Attacks in Power Grids , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[6]  Juan Miguel Morales,et al.  Data-Driven Screening of Network Constraints for Unit Commitment , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Renke Huang,et al.  Local Feature Sufficiency Exploration for Predicting Security-Constrained Generation Dispatch in Multi-area Power Systems , 2018, 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA).

[8]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Supervised learning for optimal power flow as a real-time proxy , 2016, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[9]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[10]  Dick Duffey,et al.  Power Generation , 1932, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[11]  Deepjyoti Deka,et al.  Learning for DC-OPF: Classifying active sets using neural nets , 2019, 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech.

[12]  T.J. Overbye,et al.  Some applications of Distributed Flexible AC Transmission System (D-FACTS) devices in power systems , 2008, 2008 40th North American Power Symposium.

[13]  Sergey Levine,et al.  Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks , 2017, ICML.

[14]  Tianyu Zhao,et al.  DeepOPF: Deep Neural Network for DC Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[15]  D. Divan,et al.  Distributed FACTS—A New Concept for Realizing Grid Power Flow Control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[16]  François Bouffard,et al.  Prediction of Umbrella Constraints , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[17]  David Fridovich-Keil,et al.  Toward Distributed Energy Services: Decentralizing Optimal Power Flow With Machine Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Sidhant Misra,et al.  Statistical Learning for DC Optimal Power Flow , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).

[19]  Gabriela Hug,et al.  Data-Driven Local Control Design for Active Distribution Grids Using Off-Line Optimal Power Flow and Machine Learning Techniques , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[20]  Kyri Baker,et al.  Learning Warm-Start Points For Ac Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2019 IEEE 29th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[21]  Kyri Baker,et al.  Learning Optimal Solutions for Extremely Fast AC Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[22]  Krishnamurthy Dvijotham,et al.  Real-Time Optimal Power Flow , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[23]  Minghua Chen,et al.  DeepOPF: A Deep Neural Network Approach for Security-Constrained DC Optimal Power Flow , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Reactance Perturbation for Detecting and Identifying FDI Attacks in Power System State Estimation , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[25]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  A review of transmission switching and network topology optimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[26]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[27]  Andrey Bernstein,et al.  JOINT CHANCE CONSTRAINTS REDUCTION THROUGH LEARNING IN ACTIVE DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS , 2018, 2018 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[28]  James Requeima,et al.  Meta-Optimization of Optimal Power Flow , 2019 .

[29]  David K. Y. Yau,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Moving-Target Defense in Power Grids , 2018, 2018 48th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN).