Practical parameter identifiability for spatio-temporal models of cell invasion

We examine the practical identifiability of parameters in a spatio-temporal reaction–diffusion model of a scratch assay. Experimental data involve fluorescent cell cycle labels, providing spatial information about cell position and temporal information about the cell cycle phase. Cell cycle labelling is incorporated into the reaction–diffusion model by treating the total population as two interacting subpopulations. Practical identifiability is examined using a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) framework, confirming that the parameters are identifiable when we assume the diffusivities of the subpopulations are identical, but that the parameters are practically non-identifiable when we allow the diffusivities to be distinct. We also assess practical identifiability using a profile likelihood approach, providing similar results to MCMC with the advantage of being an order of magnitude faster to compute. Therefore, we suggest that the profile likelihood ought to be adopted as a screening tool to assess practical identifiability before MCMC computations are performed.

[1]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis for Non-identifiable Dynamical Systems: Profile Likelihoods, Bootstrapping and More , 2014, CMSB.

[2]  N. Haass,et al.  Real‐time cell cycle imaging during melanoma growth, invasion, and drug response , 2014, Pigment cell & melanoma research.

[3]  Jonathan A. Sherratt,et al.  Models of epidermal wound healing , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  L. Segel,et al.  Model for chemotaxis. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Neil D. Evans,et al.  Parameter Identifiability of Fundamental Pharmacodynamic Models , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[6]  J. Bland,et al.  The tyranny of power: is there a better way to calculate sample size? , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  Brenda N. Vo,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in parameter estimates for stochastic models of collective cell spreading using approximate Bayesian computation. , 2015, Mathematical biosciences.

[8]  Philip K Maini,et al.  Traveling wave model to interpret a wound-healing cell migration assay for human peritoneal mesothelial cells. , 2004, Tissue engineering.

[9]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Simulation and inference algorithms for stochastic biochemical reaction networks: from basic concepts to state-of-the-art , 2018, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[10]  K. Painter,et al.  A continuum approach to modelling cell-cell adhesion. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  O. Chkrebtii,et al.  Maximum profile likelihood estimation of differential equation parameters through model based smoothing state estimates. , 2013, Mathematical biosciences.

[12]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY FILE: Full observability and estimation of unknown inputs, states, and parameters of nonlinear biological models , 2019 .

[13]  Matthew J. Simpson,et al.  Multi-species simple exclusion processes , 2009 .

[14]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. , 1980, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  Edmund J Crampin,et al.  MCMC can detect nonidentifiable models. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  A Bayesian Sequential Learning Framework to Parameterise Continuum Models of Melanoma Invasion into Human Skin , 2019, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[17]  V. Vieland,et al.  Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm , 1998 .

[18]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Global identifiability of nonlinear models of biological systems , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Oliver J. Maclaren,et al.  What can be estimated? Identifiability, estimability, causal inference and ill-posed inverse problems , 2019, ArXiv.

[20]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Joining forces of Bayesian and frequentist methodology: a study for inference in the presence of non-identifiability , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  P. Stark Inverse problems as statistics , 2002 .

[22]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[23]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Planning Study Size Based on Precision Rather Than Power. , 2018, Epidemiology.

[24]  R. Wilkinson Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) gives exact results under the assumption of model error , 2008, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[25]  Alexander G. Fletcher,et al.  A hierarchical Bayesian model for understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of the intestinal epithelium , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Helen M Byrne,et al.  Bayesian inference of agent-based models: a tool for studying kidney branching morphogenesis , 2017, Journal of Mathematical Biology.

[27]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Using Experimental Data and Information Criteria to Guide Model Selection for Reaction–Diffusion Problems in Mathematical Biology , 2018, bioRxiv.

[28]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Mathematical models for cell migration with real-time cell cycle dynamics , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  Suzanne L Robertson,et al.  Identifiability and estimation of multiple transmission pathways in cholera and waterborne disease. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  To Explain or To Predict? , 2010, 1101.0891.

[31]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Quantifying the effect of experimental design choices for in vitro scratch assays. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Maria Pia Saccomani,et al.  DAISY: A new software tool to test global identifiability of biological and physiological systems , 2007, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[33]  J. Banga,et al.  Structural Identifiability of Systems Biology Models: A Critical Comparison of Methods , 2011, PloS one.

[34]  John T. Nardini,et al.  Modeling keratinocyte wound healing dynamics: Cell-cell adhesion promotes sustained collective migration. , 2016, Journal of theoretical biology.

[35]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  The role of initial geometry in experimental models of wound closing , 2017, 1711.07162.

[36]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  Fluorescent indicators for simultaneous reporting of all four cell cycle phases , 2016, Nature Methods.

[37]  Matthew J. Simpson,et al.  Chemotactic and diffusive migration on a nonuniformly growing domain: numerical algorithm development and applications , 2006 .

[38]  David Welch,et al.  Approximate Bayesian computation scheme for parameter inference and model selection in dynamical systems , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Ruth E. Baker,et al.  Multiple types of data are required to identify the mechanisms influencing the spatial expansion of melanoma cell colonies , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[40]  C. Please,et al.  Experimental characterization and computational modelling of two-dimensional cell spreading for skeletal regeneration , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[41]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[42]  Elisa de Stanchina,et al.  DERIVING HUMAN ENS LINEAGES FOR CELL THERAPY AND DRUG DISCOVERY IN HIRSCHSPRUNG'S DISEASE , 2015, Nature.

[43]  Matthew J Simpson,et al.  Quantifying the roles of cell motility and cell proliferation in a circular barrier assay , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[44]  L. Fava,et al.  Fiat Lux: illuminating the cell cycle , 2017, Cell Death Discovery.

[45]  Keegan E. Hines,et al.  Determination of parameter identifiability in nonlinear biophysical models: A Bayesian approach , 2014, The Journal of general physiology.

[46]  Johan Karlsson,et al.  Comparison of approaches for parameter identifiability analysis of biological systems , 2014, Bioinform..

[47]  Y. Pawitan In all likelihood : statistical modelling and inference using likelihood , 2002 .

[48]  David R. Cox,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF STATISTICAL INFERENCE , 2017 .

[49]  Hongwen Zhu,et al.  UDP-glucose accelerates SNAI1 mRNA decay and impairs lung cancer metastasis , 2019, Nature.

[50]  James D. Murray Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[51]  Francisco Prieto-Castrillo,et al.  Research Techniques Made Simple: Analysis of Collective Cell Migration Using the Wound Healing Assay. , 2017, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[52]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .