The use of steerable channels for detecting asymmetrical signals with random orientations

In the optimization of medical imaging systems, there is a stringent need to shift from human observer studies to numerical observer studies, because of both cost and time limitations. Numerical models give an objective measure for the quality of displayed images for a given task and can be designed to predict the performance of medical specialists performing the same task. For the task of signal detection, the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) has been successfully used, although several studies indicate an overefficiency of the CHO compared to human observers. One of the main causes of this overefficiency is attributed to the intrinsic uncertainty about the signal (such as its orientation) that a human observer is dealing with. Deeper knowledge of the discrepancies of the CHO and the human observer may provide extra insight in the processing of the human visual system and this knowledge can be utilized to better fine-tune medical imaging systems. In this paper, we investigate the optimal detection of asymmetrical signals with statistically known random orientation, based on joint detection and estimation theory. We derive the optimal channelized observer for this task and we show that the optimal detection in channel space requires the use of steerable channels, which are used in steerable pyramid transforms in image processing. Even though the use of CHOs for SKS tasks has not been studied so far, our findings indicate that CHO models can be further extended to incorporate intrinsic uncertainty about the signal to behave closer to humans. Experimental results are provided to illustrate these findings.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[2]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[3]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Shiftable multiscale transforms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality. II. Fisher information, Fourier crosstalk, and figures of merit for task performance. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Rotationally symmetric vs. oriented frequency channels for the Hotelling observer: a comparison with human observers , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Enrico Magli,et al.  Joint statistical signal detection and estimation. Part I: Theoretical aspects of the problem , 2000, Signal Process..

[11]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Model observers for signal-known-statistically tasks (SKS) , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  Harrison H Barrett,et al.  Validating the use of channels to estimate the ideal linear observer. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Objective Assessment of Image Quality , 2005 .

[18]  Eric Clarkson,et al.  Efficiency of the human observer detecting random signals in random backgrounds. , 2005, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  D. DeLong,et al.  Effect of dose reduction on the detection of mammographic lesions: a mathematical observer model analysis. , 2007, Medical physics.