UPPER BOUND ON THE SATISFIABILITY THRESHOLD OF REGULAR RANDOM ( k , s )-SAT PROBLEM

We consider a strictly regular random (k, s)-SAT problem and propose a GSRR model for generating its instances. By applying the first moment method and the asymptotic approximation of the γth coefficient for generating function f(z), where λ and γ are growing at a fixed rate, we obtain a new upper bound 2 log 2−(k+1) log 2/2+ εk for this problem, which is below the best current known upper bound 2 log 2 + εk. Furthermore, it is also below the asymptotic bound of the uniform k-SAT problem, which is known as 2 log 2−(log 2+1)/2+ok(1) for large k. Thus, it illustrates that the strictly regular random (k, s)-SAT instances are computationally harder than the uniform one in general and it coincides with the experimental observations. Experiment results also indicate that the threshold for strictly regular random (k, s)-SAT problem is very close to our theoretical upper bound, and the regular random (k, s)-SAT instances generated by model GSRR are far more difficult to solve than the uniform one in each threshold point.

[1]  M. Mézard,et al.  Threshold values of random K-SAT from the cavity method , 2006 .

[2]  M. Mézard,et al.  Analytic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems , 2002, Science.

[3]  Konstantinos Panagiotou,et al.  Catching the k-NAESAT threshold , 2011, STOC '12.

[4]  Danièle Gardy,et al.  Some results on the asymptotic behaviour of coefficients of large powers of functions , 1995, Discret. Math..

[5]  Federico Ricci-Tersenghi,et al.  On the solution-space geometry of random constraint satisfaction problems , 2006, STOC '06.

[6]  Alan K. Mackworth Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Hard and Easy Distributions of SAT Problems , 1992, AAAI.

[8]  Peter C. Cheeseman,et al.  Where the Really Hard Problems Are , 1991, IJCAI.

[9]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Computers and In stractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H Freeman, San Fran , 1979 .

[10]  E. Friedgut,et al.  Sharp thresholds of graph properties, and the -sat problem , 1999 .

[11]  Andreas Goerdt A Remark on Random 2-SAT , 1999, Discret. Appl. Math..

[12]  M. Mézard,et al.  Random K-satisfiability problem: from an analytic solution to an efficient algorithm. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Allan Sly,et al.  Proof of the Satisfiability Conjecture for Large k , 2014, STOC.

[14]  Pekka Orponen,et al.  Circumspect descent prevails in solving random constraint satisfaction problems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  X. Jin Factor graphs and the Sum-Product Algorithm , 2002 .

[16]  Allan Sly,et al.  Satisfiability Threshold for Random Regular nae-sat , 2013, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[17]  Amin Coja-Oghlan,et al.  The condensation phase transition in the regular k-SAT model , 2016, APPROX-RANDOM.

[18]  Mikael Skoglund,et al.  Bounds on Threshold of Regular Random k-SAT , 2010, SAT.

[19]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Finding hard instances of the satisfiability problem: A survey , 1996, Satisfiability Problem: Theory and Applications.

[20]  S Kirkpatrick,et al.  Critical Behavior in the Satisfiability of Random Boolean Expressions , 1994, Science.

[21]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The complexity of theorem-proving procedures , 1971, STOC.

[22]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  Mick gets some (the odds are on his side) (satisfiability) , 1992, Proceedings., 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[23]  Philippe Flajolet,et al.  Analytic Combinatorics , 2009 .

[24]  Amin Coja-Oghlan,et al.  The asymptotic k-SAT threshold , 2014, STOC.

[25]  H. Robbins A Remark on Stirling’s Formula , 1955 .

[26]  Federico Ricci-Tersenghi,et al.  Random Formulas Have Frozen Variables , 2009, SIAM J. Comput..

[27]  Bart Selman,et al.  Regular Random k-SAT: Properties of Balanced Formulas , 2005, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[28]  Rémi Monasson,et al.  Determining computational complexity from characteristic ‘phase transitions’ , 1999, Nature.