A hybrid multi-criteria approach to GPR image mining applied to water supply system maintenance

Abstract Data processing techniques for Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) image mining provide essential information to optimize maintenance management of Water Supply Systems (WSSs). These techniques aim to elaborate on radargrams in order to produce meaningful graphical representations of critical buried components of WSSs. These representations are helpful non-destructive evaluation tools to prevent possible failures in WSSs by keeping them adequately monitored. This paper proposes an integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach to prioritize various data processing techniques by means of ranking their outputs, namely their resulting GPR image representations. The Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is applied to weight various evaluation criteria, with the purpose of managing vagueness and uncertainty characterizing experts' judgments. Then, the ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalite III (ELECTRE III) method is used to obtain the final ranking of alternatives. A real case study, focusing on a set of four GPR images as outputs of different data processing techniques, is presented to prove the usefulness of the proposed hybrid approach. In particular, the GPR images are ranked according the evaluation of five criteria namely visualization, interpretation, identification of features, extraction of information and affordability. The findings offer a structured support in selecting the most suitable data processing technique(s) to explore WSS underground. In the presented case, two options, namely the variance filter and the subtraction methods, offer the best results.

[1]  Antonella Certa,et al.  ELECTRE III to dynamically support the decision maker about the periodic replacements configurations for a multi-component system , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[3]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[4]  Osama Hunaidi,et al.  GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR FOR DETECTION OF LEAKS IN BURIED PLASTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION PIPES , 1998 .

[5]  Sevket Demirci,et al.  Ground penetrating radar imaging of water leaks from buried pipes based on back-projection method , 2012 .

[6]  Maysam Abedi,et al.  ELECTRE III: A knowledge-driven method for integration of geophysical data with geological and geochemical data in mineral prospectivity mapping , 2012 .

[7]  Martin Rogers,et al.  Electre and decision support : methods and applications in engineering and infrastructure investment , 2000 .

[8]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[9]  C Bouchard,et al.  A methodology for identifying vulnerable locations to taste and odour problems in a drinking water system. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  Jean-Marie Nicolas,et al.  Robust adaptive detection of buried pipes using GPR , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[11]  A. Hatami-Marbini,et al.  An Extension of the Electre I Method for Group Decision-Making Under a Fuzzy Environment , 2011 .

[12]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[13]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic - theory and applications , 1995 .

[14]  Angelos Amditis,et al.  Detection of water leaks in supply pipes using continuous wave sensor operating at 2.45 GHz , 2010 .

[15]  Bian Ka,et al.  Application of Fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to China Dry Port Location Selection , 2011 .

[16]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Strategic analysis of healthcare service quality using fuzzy AHP methodology , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  An Overview of ELECTRE Methods and their Recent Extensions , 2013 .

[19]  Dong Jun,et al.  Macro-site selection of wind/solar hybrid power station based on ELECTRE-II , 2014 .

[20]  Joaquín Izquierdo,et al.  3D Model Construction of Water Supply System Pipes Based on GPR Images , 2014 .

[21]  William A. Sauck,et al.  GPR for mapping fractures and as a guide for the extraction of ornamental granite from a quarry: A case study from southern Brazil , 2006 .

[22]  Mehpare Timor,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications , 2010 .

[23]  Joaquín Izquierdo,et al.  Location of buried plastic pipes using multi-agent support based on GPR images , 2011 .

[24]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  Multicriteria Decision-Aid , 1992 .

[25]  Peng Wang,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Joonas Hokkanen,et al.  The Choice of a Solid Waste Management System Using the Electre Ii Decision-Aid Method , 1995 .

[27]  Silvia Carpitella,et al.  The ELECTRE I method to optimise GPR data processing analyses for maintenance of water networks , 2017 .

[28]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  BISTATIC TOMOGRAPHIC GPR IMAGING FOR INCIPIENT PIPELINE LEAKAGE EVALUATION , 2010 .

[29]  Ali Cafer Gürbüz,et al.  Compressive sensing of underground structures using GPR , 2012, Digit. Signal Process..

[30]  Ahmet Can Kutlu,et al.  Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[32]  E. Løken Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems , 2007 .

[33]  Arvind R. Singh,et al.  A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development , 2017 .

[34]  Alexandros Nikas,et al.  A group decision making tool for assessing climate policy risks against multiple criteria , 2018, Heliyon.

[35]  Antonella Certa,et al.  A Multi-Decision Makers Approach to Select the Maintenance Plan for a Multi-Component System , 2013 .

[36]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[37]  Michael Burrow,et al.  Condition assessment of the buried utility service infrastructure , 2012 .

[38]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  An integrated fuzzy AHP-ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Orlando Durán,et al.  Selección de máquinas de control numérico usando Fuzzy AHP , 2006 .

[40]  N. Malys,et al.  Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability , 2016 .

[41]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Idel Montalvo,et al.  Water supply system component evaluation from GPR radargrams using a multi-agent approach , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[43]  Sylvain Kubler,et al.  A state-of the-art survey & testbed of fuzzy AHP (FAHP) applications , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  A. Muñoz-Porcar,et al.  The renewal of assets using a tool to aid decision making , 2015 .

[45]  Antonella Certa,et al.  Multi-objective human resources allocation in R&D projects planning , 2009 .

[46]  Antonella Certa,et al.  Ranking of shelf life models based on smart logistic unit using the ELECTRE III method , 2015 .

[47]  Alireza Sotoudeh-Anvari,et al.  A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems , 2017 .

[48]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Multiagent Systems - Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations , 2009 .

[49]  Lei Yang,et al.  Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for the selection of wastewater reuse targets , 2014 .

[50]  Zheng Liu,et al.  State of the art review of inspection technologies for condition assessment of water pipes , 2013 .