Control of mobile robot for remote medical examination: Design concepts and users' feedback from experimental studies

In this article we discuss movement control of a ReMeDi medical mobile robot from the user perspective. The control is essentially limited to the level of operator actions where the operator is a member of a nursing staff. Two working modes are the base of considerations: long distance (LD) and short distance (SD) movement. In this context two robot control techniques are the subject of study: manual with use of a gamepad and “point and click” on a map that is related to autonomous motion with use of an onboard navigation system. In the SD mode the user manually operates the robot, that is close to a laying down patient on a settee. In the LD mode the mobile base moves autonomously in a space shared with people to the desired position. Two user studies were conducted. The results show that from the perspective of LD mode the autonomous navigation is efficient and reduces the burden of the medical personnel. In the SD case, the results show that the users were able to precisely position the robot. Besides, the users perceived the manual control with the gamepad as intuitive. In all cases the medical personnel consider this technology as safe and useful. Safety is also confirmed by patients.

[1]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  D Huston,et al.  Structural Sensing, Health Monitoring, and Performance Evaluation , 2010 .

[3]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Robotic systems in health care , 2014, 2014 7th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI).

[4]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Studies in Public Places as a Means to Positively Influence People's Attitude towards Robots , 2012, ICSR.

[5]  Katherine M. Tsui,et al.  Iterative design of a semi-autonomous social telepresence robot research platform: a chronology , 2014, Intell. Serv. Robotics.

[6]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale , 2009 .

[7]  Takashi Tsubouchi,et al.  Path-following algorithms and experiments for an unmanned surface vehicle , 2009 .

[8]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  An evaluation of local autonomy applied to teleoperated vehicles in underground mines , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Bartlomiej Stanczyk,et al.  Control and perception system for ReMeDi robot mobile platform , 2015, 2015 20th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR).

[10]  Muralindran Mariappan,et al.  Safety System and Navigation for Orthopaedic Robot (OTOROB) , 2011, ICIRA.

[11]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Experiences with an Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Autonomous Robot Navigation in Highly Populated Pedestrian Zones , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[13]  M. Janiak,et al.  Control system architecture for the investigation of motion control algorithms on an example of the mobile platform Rex , 2015 .

[14]  M. Muralindran,et al.  OTOROB: Robot for Orthopaedic Surgeon - Roboscope: Non-Interventional Medical Robot for Telerounding , 2011, 2011 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Gerald Stollnberger,et al.  Capturing Expected User Experience of Robotic Systems in the Health Care Sector , 2014 .

[16]  Muralindran Mariappan,et al.  A Remote Navigation Methodology for a Four Wheel Rectangular Configured Holonomic Mobile Telemedicine Robot , .

[17]  Chin-Feng Lin,et al.  Mobile Telemedicine: A Survey Study , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[18]  Jee-Hwan Ryu,et al.  A user study of command strategies for mobile robot teleoperation , 2009, Intell. Serv. Robotics.

[19]  Christian Laugier,et al.  An autonomous car-like robot navigating safely among pedestrians , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.