The role of perspective taking in how children connect reference frames when explaining astronomical phenomena

ABSTRACT This study investigates the role of perspective-taking skills in how children explain spatially complex astronomical phenomena. Explaining many astronomical phenomena, especially those studied in elementary and middle school, requires shifting between an Earth-based description of the phenomena and a space-based reference frame. We studied 7- to 9-year-old children (N = 15) to (a) develop a method for capturing how children make connections between reference frames and to (b) explore connections between perspective-taking skill and the nature of children's explanations. Children's explanations for the apparent motion of the Sun and stars and for seasonal changes in constellations were coded for accuracy of explanation, connection between frames of reference, and use of gesture. Children with higher spatial perspective-taking skills made more explicit connections between reference frames and used certain gesture-types more frequently, although this pattern was evident for only some phenomena. Findings suggest that children – particularly those with lower perspective-taking skills – may need additional support in learning to explicitly connect reference frames in astronomy. Understanding spatial thinking among children who successfully made explicit connections between reference frames in their explanations could be a starting point for future instruction in this domain.

[1]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[2]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[3]  L. S. Liben Education for Spatial Thinking , 2007 .

[4]  Sheryl A. Sorby,et al.  The Development and Assessment of a Course for Enhancing the 3‐D Spatial Visualization Skills of First Year Engineering Students , 2000 .

[5]  Stacy B. Ehrlich,et al.  The importance of gesture in children's spatial reasoning. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[6]  D. McNeill Gesture and Thought , 2005 .

[7]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Children Learning to Explain Daily Celestial Motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference , 2011 .

[8]  J. Wilhelm Gender Differences in Lunar‐related Scientific and Mathematical Understandings , 2009 .

[9]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[10]  R. Driver,et al.  The Pupil as Scientist , 1983 .

[11]  Lynn S. Liben,et al.  Understanding Person-Space-Map Relations: Cartographic and Developmental Perspectives. , 1993 .

[12]  J. McMenamy Entering the Childʼs Mind: The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research and Practice , 1999 .

[13]  Inge Heyer,et al.  ESTABELECENDO UMA RELAÇÃO EMPÍRICA ENTRE O RACIOCÍNIO ESPACIAL DOS ESTUDANTES DE GRADUAÇÃO EM CARREIRAS NÃO CIENTÍFICAS E SEU CONHECIMENTO CONCEITUAL DA ASTRONOMIA , 2013 .

[14]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us? , 2013, Cognitive Processing.

[15]  Adam E. Christensen,et al.  Spatial Foundations of Science Education: The Illustrative Case of Instruction on Introductory Geological Concepts , 2011 .

[16]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  D. C. Howell Statistical methods for psychology, 3rd ed. , 1992 .

[18]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Learning to Explain Astronomy Across Moving Frames of Reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts , 2014 .

[19]  Mike Stieff,et al.  The role of spatial ability and strategy preference for spatial problem solving in organic chemistry , 2012 .

[20]  M. Kallery Astronomical Concepts and Events Awareness for Young Children , 2011 .

[21]  J. Ramadas,et al.  Designed and Spontaneous Gestures in Elementary Astronomy Education , 2011 .

[22]  F. J. Langdon,et al.  The Child's Conception of Space , 1967 .

[23]  A. Proctor,et al.  Astronomy in the K-8 Core Curriculum: A Survey of State Requirements Nationwide. , 2006 .

[24]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Thinking Across the College Curriculum: A Report on a Specialist Meeting , 2014, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[25]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[26]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  A. Albanese,et al.  Models in Science and in Education: A Critical Review of Research on Students' Ideas About the Earth and its Place in the Universe , 1997 .

[28]  T. Mueller Learning to Think Spatially , 2006 .

[29]  F. Paas,et al.  An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory: Using the Human Motor System and Collaboration to Support the Learning of Complex Cognitive Tasks , 2012 .

[30]  Kim A. Kastens,et al.  Epistemic Actions in Science Education , 2008, Spatial Cognition.

[31]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners' and Teachers' Gestures , 2012 .

[32]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  ESTABLISHING THE EMPIRICAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NON-SCIENCE MAJORING UNDERGRADUATE LEARNERS' SPATIAL THINKING SKILLS AND THEIR CONCEPTUAL ASTRONOMY KNOWLEDGE , 2012 .

[33]  W. McComas Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2014 .

[34]  E. Kikas The Effect of Verbal and Visuo-Spatial Abilities on the Development of Knowledge of the Earth , 2006 .

[35]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Shamin Padalkar,et al.  Visualisation and Reasoning in Explaining the Phases of the Moon , 2009 .

[37]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Wolff‐Michael Roth From gesture to scientific language , 2000 .

[39]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Physical Imagery: Kinematic versus Dynamic Models , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Elaine M. Crowder Gestures at Work in Sense-Making Science Talk , 1996 .

[41]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Learning what children know about space from looking at their hands: the added value of gesture in spatial communication. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[42]  O. Parnafes Developing Explanations and Developing Understanding: Students Explain the Phases of the Moon Using Visual Representations , 2012 .

[43]  Martha W. Alibali,et al.  Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production , 2007 .

[44]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gesturing Saves Cognitive Resources When Talking About Nonpresent Objects , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Alice A. Black Spatial Ability and Earth Science Conceptual Understanding , 2005 .