Do infants perceive the social robot Keepon as a communicative partner?

This study investigates if infants perceive an unfamiliar agent, such as the robot Keepon, as a social agent after observing an interaction between the robot and a human adult. 23 infants, aged 9-17 month, were exposed, in a first phase, to either a contingent interaction between the active robot and an active human adult, or to an interaction between an active human adult and the non-active robot, followed by a second phase, in which infants were offered the opportunity to initiate a turn-taking interaction with Keepon. The measured variables were: (1) the number of social initiations the infant directed toward the robot, and (2) the number of anticipatory orientations of attention to the agent that follows in the conversation. The results indicate a significant higher level of initiations in the interactive robot condition compared to the non-active robot condition, while the difference between the frequencies of anticipations of turn-taking behaviors was not significant.

[1]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Explorations in engagement for humans and robots , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorders with (partially) autonomous control: Challenges and outlook , 2012, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[3]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Drum-mate: interaction dynamics and gestures in human–humanoid drumming experiments , 2010, Connect. Sci..

[4]  Peter Wittenburg,et al.  Annotation by Category: ELAN and ISO DCR , 2008, LREC.

[5]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Infant intersubjectivity: research, theory, and clinical applications. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Like me” as a building block for understanding other minds: Bodily acts, attention, and intention. Ed. Malle, BF, L. J. Moses, and DA Baldwin , 2001 .

[7]  T. Kanda,et al.  Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons , 2005, Cognition.

[8]  A. Meltzoff Elements of a developmental theory of imitation , 2002 .

[9]  M. Legerstee,et al.  Precursors to the development of intention at 6 months: understanding people and their actions. , 2000, Developmental psychology.

[10]  Ian R. Fasel,et al.  The emergence of shared attention: Using robots to test developmental theories , 2001 .

[11]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Can a robot empathize with people? , 2004, Artificial Life and Robotics.

[12]  Jacqueline Nadel,et al.  Imitation in infancy , 2011 .

[13]  H. Kozima,et al.  Interactive Robots as Facilitators of Childrens Social Development , 2006 .

[14]  C. Trevarthen The function of emotions in early infant communication and development , 2017 .

[15]  Susan C. Johnson,et al.  Infants' attribution of a goal to a morphologically unfamiliar agent. , 2004, Developmental science.

[16]  A. Meltzoff Foundations for developing a concept of self: The role of imitation in relating self to other and the value of social mirroring, social modeling, and self practice in infancy. , 1990 .

[17]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Infants' understanding of people and things: From body imitation to folk psychology. , 1995 .

[18]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[19]  Anne Fernald,et al.  Prosody and focus in speech to infants and adults , 1991 .

[20]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Enhancing My Keepon robot: A simple and low-cost solution for robot platform in Human-Robot Interaction studies , 2014, The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  J. Movellan,et al.  The development of gaze following as a Bayesian systems identification problem , 2002, Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Development and Learning. ICDL 2002.

[22]  Kerstin Fischer,et al.  The impact of the contingency of robot feedback on HRI , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS).

[23]  E. Tronick Emotions and emotional communication in infants. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[24]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  "Social" robots are psychological agents for infants: A test of gaze following , 2010, Neural Networks.

[25]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures Imitated and the Underlying Mechanisms. , 1989, Developmental psychology.

[26]  L. Gogate,et al.  A study of multimodal motherese: the role of temporal synchrony between verbal labels and gestures. , 2000, Child development.

[27]  A. Fernald,et al.  A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Keepon , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[29]  Colwyn Trevarthen,et al.  The self born in intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating. , 1993 .

[30]  A. Meltzoff 1 Imitation and Other Minds: The "Like Me" Hypothesis , 2005 .

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[32]  J. Sidnell,et al.  Language Diversity and Social Action , 2012, Current Anthropology.

[33]  A. Decasper,et al.  Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer Their Mothers' Voices , 1980 .