Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales.

To examine interactions among spatial scales in disparity processing, we have measured the upper disparity limit for binocular single vision (the diplopia threshold) for high-spatial-frequency test stimuli in the presence of cosine gratings of lower spatial frequency that defined a surface in depth. When the frequency of this grating surface was 2.0 octaves below that of the test, the test fusion range was reduced by a factor of 3-4 relative to the condition in which no grating surface was present. However, gratings 4.0 octaves below the test frequency had no effect, and the test and grating were seen transparently at different depths. Further experiments indicate that the effect is orientation specific and that high-frequency gratings do not affect low-frequency tests. Finally, experiments using grating surfaces tilted in depth indicate that fusion at high spatial frequencies is constrained to a range centered on the local disparity of the surface defined by the lower frequency. These results are important for computational models for stereopsis that are based on coarse-to-fine matching strategies.

[1]  W. Weibull.  A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[2]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  A new kind of stereoscopic vision. , 1970, Vision research.

[5]  W. Richards,et al.  Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception. , 1971, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[8]  C. Tyler.  Stereoscopic Vision: Cortical Limitations and a Disparity Scaling Effect , 1973, Science.

[9]  Quick Rf.  A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[10]  B. Julesz,et al.  Independent Spatial-Frequency-Tuned Channels in Binocular Fusion and Rivalry , 1975 .

[11]  D. Marr,et al.  Theory of human stereopsis (A) , 1977 .

[12]  G. Poggio,et al.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. , 1977, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T. Poggio,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Bergen,et al.  A four mechanism model for threshold spatial vision , 1979, Vision Research.

[15]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  B. Julesz,et al.  A disparity gradient limit for binocular fusion. , 1980, Science.

[17]  B. Julesz,et al.  Early visual perception. , 1981, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  D. Ferster.  A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[20]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Contrast matching data predicted from contrast increment thresholds , 1984, Vision Research.

[21]  H. K. Nishihara,et al.  Practical Real-Time Imaging Stereo Matcher , 1984 .

[22]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Subjective contours capture stereopsis , 1985, Nature.

[24]  D. Badcock,et al.  Depth-increment detection function for individual spatial channels. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[25]  G. Westheimer.  Spatial interaction in the domain of disparity signals in human stereoscopic vision. , 1986, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  Interpolation and the detection of fine structure in stereoscopic matching , 1987, Vision Research.

[28]  K. Prazdny,et al.  On the coarse-to-fine strategy in stereomatching , 1987 .

[29]  L. Quam.  Hierarchical warp stereo , 1987 .

[30]  G. J. Mitchison,et al.  The resolution of ambiguous stereoscopic matches by interpolation , 1987, Vision Research.

[31]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Limits of binocular fusion in the short wave sensitive (“blue”) cones , 1988, Vision Research.

[32]  J T Todd,et al.  The perception of stereoscopic transparency , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[34]  R. Blake.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[35]  Randolph Blake,et al.  On the coexistence of stereopsis and binocular rivalry , 1991, Vision Research.