Amortizing Secure Computation with Penalties

Motivated by the impossibility of achieving fairness in secure computation [Cleve, STOC 1986], recent works study a model of fairness in which an adversarial party that aborts on receiving output is forced to pay a mutually predefined monetary penalty to every other party that did not receive the output. These works show how to design protocols for secure computation with penalties that guarantees that either fairness is guaranteed or that each honest party obtains a monetary penalty from the adversary. Protocols for this task are typically designed in an hybrid model where parties have access to a "claim-or-refund" transaction functionality denote FCR*. In this work, we obtain improvements on the efficiency of these constructions by amortizing the cost over multiple executions of secure computation with penalties. More precisely, for computational security parameter λ, we design a protocol that implements l = poly}(λ) instances of secure computation with penalties where the total number of calls to FCR* is independent of l.

[1]  Alptekin Küpçü,et al.  Usable optimistic fair exchange , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[2]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  How to generate and exchange secrets , 1986, 27th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1986).

[3]  N. Asokan,et al.  Optimistic protocols for fair exchange , 1997, CCS '97.

[4]  Marcin Andrychowicz,et al.  How to deal with malleability of BitCoin transactions , 2013, ArXiv.

[5]  Silvio Micali,et al.  A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks , 1988, SIAM J. Comput..

[6]  Alptekin Küpçü,et al.  Making p2p accountable without losing privacy , 2007, WPES '07.

[7]  Richard Cleve,et al.  Limits on the security of coin flips when half the processors are faulty , 1986, STOC '86.

[8]  Iddo Bentov,et al.  How to Use Bitcoin to Design Fair Protocols , 2014, CRYPTO.

[9]  Marcin Andrychowicz,et al.  Secure Multiparty Computations on Bitcoin , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[10]  Vinod Vaikuntanathan,et al.  Improvements to Secure Computation with Penalties , 2016, CCS.

[11]  Jonathan Katz,et al.  Partial Fairness in Secure Two-Party Computation , 2010, EUROCRYPT.

[12]  Silvio Micali,et al.  How to play ANY mental game , 1987, STOC.

[13]  Christian Decker,et al.  A Fast and Scalable Payment Network with Bitcoin Duplex Micropayment Channels , 2015, SSS.

[14]  Andrew Y. Lindell Legally-Enforceable Fairness in Secure Two-Party Computation , 2008, CT-RSA.

[15]  David Chaum,et al.  Multiparty unconditionally secure protocols , 1988, STOC '88.

[16]  Iddo Bentov,et al.  How to Use Bitcoin to Play Decentralized Poker , 2015, CCS.

[17]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Bitter to Better - How to Make Bitcoin a Better Currency , 2012, Financial Cryptography.

[18]  Oded Goldreich,et al.  Foundations of Cryptography: Volume 2, Basic Applications , 2004 .

[19]  Iddo Bentov,et al.  How to Use Bitcoin to Incentivize Correct Computations , 2014, CCS.

[20]  Aggelos Kiayias,et al.  Fair and Robust Multi-party Computation Using a Global Transaction Ledger , 2016, EUROCRYPT.

[21]  Benny Pinkas,et al.  Fair Secure Two-Party Computation , 2003, EUROCRYPT.

[22]  Marcin Andrychowicz,et al.  Fair Two-Party Computations via Bitcoin Deposits , 2014, Financial Cryptography Workshops.

[23]  Elaine Shi,et al.  Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[24]  Abhi Shelat,et al.  Micropayments for Decentralized Currencies , 2015, IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch..

[25]  Oded Goldreich Foundations of Cryptography: Index , 2001 .

[26]  Iddo Bentov,et al.  Note on fair coin toss via Bitcoin , 2014, ArXiv.

[27]  B. E. Eckbo,et al.  Appendix , 1826, Epilepsy Research.

[28]  Ethan Heilman,et al.  Blindly Signed Contracts: Anonymous On-Blockchain and Off-Blockchain Bitcoin Transactions , 2016, Financial Cryptography Workshops.