Torque and workspace analysis for flexible tendon driven mechanisms

Tendon driven mechanisms have been considered in robotic design for several decades. They provide lightweight end effectors with high dynamics. Using remote actuators it is possible to free more space for mechanics or electronics. Nevertheless, lightweight mechanism are fragile and unfortunately their control software can not protect them during the very first instant of an impact. Compliant mechanisms address this issue, providing a mechanical low pass filter, increasing the time available before the controller reacts. Using adjustable stiffness elements and an antagonistic architecture, the joint stiffness can be adjusted by variation of the tendon pre-tension. In this paper, the fundamental equations of m antagonistic tendon driven mechanisms are reviewed. Due to limited tendon forces the maximum torque and the maximum acheivable stiffness are dependent. This implies, that not only the torque workspace, or the stiffness workspace must be considered but also their interactions. Since the results are of high dimensionality, quality measures are necessary to provide a synthetic view. Two quality measures, similar to those used in grasp planning, are presented. They both provide the designer with a more precise insight into the mechanism.

[1]  Hamid D. Taghirad,et al.  Geometrical workspace analysis of a cable-driven redundant parallel manipulator: KNTU CDRPM , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Hiroaki Kobayashi,et al.  On Tendon-Driven Robotic Mechanisms with Redundant Tendons , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Koichi Koganezawa,et al.  Stiffness control of antagonistically driven redundant D.O.F. manipulator , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  Karun B. Shimoga,et al.  Robot Grasp Synthesis Algorithms: A Survey , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Impedance control for variable stiffness mechanisms with nonlinear joint coupling , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  G. Hirzinger,et al.  A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Koichi Koganezawa,et al.  Antagonistic control of multi-DOF joint by using the actuator with non-linear elasticity , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[9]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  VSA-II: a novel prototype of variable stiffness actuator for safe and performing robots interacting with humans , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Alin Albu-Schaffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[11]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Grasp planning: how to choose a suitable task wrench space , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[12]  Hitoshi Kino,et al.  Basic characteristics of tendon-driven manipulator using belt pulleys , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[13]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Mechanism design for Variable Stiffness Actuation based on enumeration and analysis of performance , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Antagonism for a Highly Anthropomorphic Hand–Arm System , 2008, Adv. Robotics.

[15]  Amir Khajepour,et al.  Optimization of Actuator Forces in Cable-Based Parallel Manipulators Using Convex Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Koichi Koganezawa,et al.  Mechanical stiffness control of tendon-driven joints , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No.99CH36289).

[17]  M. Spong,et al.  Robot Modeling and Control , 2005 .