Inferring Private Information in Wireless Sensor Networks

In wireless sensor networks, estimating a global parameter from locally obtained measurements via local interactions is known as the distributed parameter estimation problem. Solving these problems often require the deployment of distributed optimization algorithms that rely on a constant exchange of information among the sensor nodes. This makes such distributed algorithms vulnerable to attackers or malicious nodes that want to gain access to private information regarding the network. Based on the sliding mode control scheme, here we present a novel approach to infer sensitive information (e.g., gradient or private parameters of the local objective function) regarding a node of interest by intercepting the communication between the nodes. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is illustrated in a representative example of distributed event localization using an acoustic sensor network.

[1]  Paolo Braca,et al.  Learning With Privacy in Consensus $+$ Obfuscation , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Randy A. Freeman,et al.  Decentralized Environmental Modeling by Mobile Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  Feng Yan,et al.  Distributed Autonomous Online Learning: Regrets and Intrinsic Privacy-Preserving Properties , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[4]  Wotao Yin,et al.  On the Global and Linear Convergence of the Generalized Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2016, J. Sci. Comput..

[5]  Christopher Edwards,et al.  Dual-layer adaptive sliding mode control , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[6]  Jemin George,et al.  A finite point process approach to multi-target localization using transient measurements , 2013, Inf. Fusion.

[7]  Jemin George,et al.  Shooter localization using soldier-worn gunfire detection systems , 2011, 14th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[8]  Cédric Richard,et al.  Toward privacy-preserving diffusion strategies for adaptation and learning over networks , 2016, 2016 24th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[9]  Sonia Martínez,et al.  Distributed convex optimization via continuous-time coordination algorithms with discrete-time communication , 2014, Autom..

[10]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Approximate Primal Solutions and Rate Analysis for Dual Subgradient Methods , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[11]  P. Olver.  Nonlinear Systems , 2013 .

[12]  Vadim I. Utkin,et al.  Sliding Modes in Control and Optimization , 1992, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[13]  Jemin George,et al.  Distributed Maximum Likelihood Using Dynamic Average Consensus , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[14]  Qing Ling,et al.  EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimization , 2014, 1404.6264.

[15]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  Advances on localization techniques for wireless sensor networks: A survey , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[16]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Constrained Consensus and Optimization in Multi-Agent Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Giuseppe Thadeu Freitas de Abreu,et al.  On the Maximum Likelihood Approach for Source and Network Localization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  John Langford,et al.  Slow Learners are Fast , 2009, NIPS.

[19]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Distributed Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[20]  Lida Xu,et al.  Compressed Sensing Signal and Data Acquisition in Wireless Sensor Networks and Internet of Things , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.