Source stability index: A novel beamforming based localisation metric

Many experimental studies into human brain function now use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to non-invasively investigate human neuronal activity. A number of different analysis techniques use the observed magnetic fields outside of the head to estimate the location and strength of the underlying neural generators. One such technique, a spatial filtering method known as Beamforming, produces whole-head volumetric images of activation. Typically, a differential power map throughout the head is generated between a time window containing the response to a stimulus of interest and a window containing background brain activity. A statistical test is normally performed to reveal locations which show a significantly different response in the presence of the stimulus. Despite this being a widely used measure, for both phase-locked and non-phase-locked information, it requires a number of assumptions; namely that the baseline activity defined is stable and also that a change in total power is the most effective way of revealing the neuronal sources required for the task. This paper introduces a metric which evaluates the consistency of the response at each location within a cortical volume. Such a method of localisation negates the need for a baseline period of activity to be defined and also moves away from simply considering the energy content of brain activity. The paper presents both simulated and real data. It demonstrates that this new metric of stability is able to more accurately and, crucially, more reliably draw inferences about neuronal sources of interest.

[1]  Wilkin Chau,et al.  Determination of activation areas in the human auditory cortex by means of synthetic aperture magnetometry , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  M-X Huang,et al.  Commonalities and Differences Among Vectorized Beamformers in Electromagnetic Source Imaging , 2003, Brain Topography.

[4]  Robinson Se,et al.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). , 2004 .

[5]  David Poeppel,et al.  Performance of an MEG adaptive-beamformer technique in the presence of correlated neural activities: effects on signal intensity and time-course estimates , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[7]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Five-dimensional neuroimaging: Localization of the time–frequency dynamics of cortical activity , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  S Johnson Analysis of nonlinear dynamic physiological systems. , 2006 .

[9]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[10]  G. Barnes,et al.  Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Yusuke Murayama,et al.  How not to study spontaneous activity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  C. Michel,et al.  Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[13]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  C Pantev,et al.  Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Imaging the dynamics of the auditory steady-state evoked response , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  C Pantev,et al.  A high-precision magnetoencephalographic study of human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. Cheyne,et al.  Spatiotemporal mapping of cortical activity accompanying voluntary movements using an event‐related beamforming approach , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Shannon D. Blunt,et al.  Spatio–Temporal Reconstruction of Bilateral Auditory Steady-State Responses Using MEG Beamformers , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Can we observe collective neuronal activity from macroscopic aggregate signals? , 2009, NeuroImage.

[21]  B.D. Van Veen,et al.  Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering , 1988, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[22]  R M Leahy,et al.  A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Antony B. Morland,et al.  DataViewer3D: An Open-Source, Cross-Platform Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Data Visualization Tool , 2009, Front. Neuroinform..

[24]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[25]  Niko Wilbert,et al.  Modular Toolkit for Data Processing (MDP): A Python Data Processing Framework , 2008, Frontiers Neuroinformatics.

[26]  Timothy Bardouille,et al.  MEG imaging of sensorimotor areas using inter-trial coherence in vibrotactile steady-state responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  T. Picton,et al.  Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.