A Teacher Survey on Educational Data Management Practices: Tracking and Storage of Activity Traces

When students participate in computer-mediated learning, their activities are often recorded for learning analytics and educational data mining purposes. While handling student data has associated privacy concerns and is often subject to legal regulations, there is a limited understanding of how educational data is currently managed in practice. To clarify this question, we conducted a survey of over 100 teachers, examining their experience with storing and analyzing student data. The survey identified the wide variety of platforms used to track and store student activity traces, highlighting the necessity to develop common data exchange standards and enforce data management policies that are consistent across platforms. In addition, the responses also revealed a mismatch between platform affordances regarding data tracking and storage, and teacher awareness of such affordances. This disconnect could be mitigated by reinforcing the transparency policies and usability of educational platforms, as well as by improving teacher data management literacy.

[1]  Tobias Hecking,et al.  AngeLA: Putting the teacher in control of student privacy in the online classroom , 2014, 2014 Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[2]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Learning analytics in higher education --- challenges and policies: a review of eight learning analytics policies , 2017, LAK.

[3]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Perceiving Learning at a Glance: A Systematic Literature Review of Learning Dashboard Research , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[4]  Mandy Lupton,et al.  Learning analytics beyond the LMS: the connected learning analytics toolkit , 2015, LAK.

[5]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Learning analytics in small-scale teacher-led innovations: Ethical and data privacy issues , 2016 .

[6]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Translating Learning into Numbers: A Generic Framework for Learning Analytics , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  A reference model for learning analytics , 2012 .

[8]  Stefaan Ternier,et al.  Dutch Cooking with xAPI Recipes: The Good, the Bad, and the Consistent , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[9]  Christina M. Steiner,et al.  LEA in Private: A Privacy and Data Protection Framework for a Learning Analytics Toolbox , 2016 .

[10]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[11]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Privacy and analytics: it's a DELICATE issue a checklist for trusted learning analytics , 2016, LAK.

[12]  Dai Griffiths,et al.  The influence of data protection and privacy frameworks on the design of learning analytics systems , 2017, LAK.

[13]  L. Nathan,et al.  If Not Us, Who? Social Media Policy and the Ischool Classroom. , 2014 .

[14]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Guest Editorial: Ethics and Privacy in Learning Analytics , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[15]  George Siemens,et al.  Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[16]  Dennis Zielke,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Learning Analytics Toolkit for Teachers , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..