Novel Nonlinear Elastic Actuators for Passively Controlling Robotic Joint Compliance

The ability to control compliance of robotic joints is desirable because the resulting robotic mechanisms can adapt to varying task requirements and can take advantage of natural limb and joint dynamics. The implementation of controllable compliance in robots, however, is often constrained by the inherent instability of active compliance methods and by the limited availability of the custom, nonlinear springs needed by passive compliance methods. This work overcomes a major limitation of passive compliance by producing designs for two novel mechanisms capable of generating a wide variety of specifiable, nonlinear elastic relationships. One of these designs is physically implemented as a quadratic "spring" and is used to create a passively compliant robot joint with series-elastic actuation. A simple feed-forward algorithm is then experimentally shown to be sufficient to control independently and simultaneously both joint angle and joint compliance, regardless of the presence of external forces on the joint. We believe that this is the first physically constructed system to use antagonistic quadratic springs to successfully demonstrate open-loop, independent, and simultaneous control of both joint angle and joint stiffness. Because this approach better emulates the underlying joint mechanics used by animals, it may improve both the quality and variety of robotic movements.

[1]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Towards the development of a humanoid arm by minimizing interaction forces through minimum impedance control , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[2]  J. Salisbury,et al.  Active stiffness control of a manipulator in cartesian coordinates , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[3]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  Thomas G. Sugar,et al.  Design and control of a compliant parallel manipulator , 2002 .

[5]  Josip Loncaric,et al.  Geometrical analysis of compliant mechanisms in robotics , 1985 .

[6]  Matthew M. Williamson,et al.  Series elastic actuators , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[7]  Dimitar Chakarov,et al.  Study of the antagonistic stiffness of parallel manipulators with actuation redundancy , 2004 .

[8]  P. Mason Dynamic stiffness and crossbridge action in muscle , 1978, Biophysics of structure and mechanism.

[9]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Donald Russell,et al.  Implementation of variable joint stiffness through antagonistic actuation using rolamite springs , 1999 .

[11]  Richard Quint van der Linde,et al.  Design, analysis, and control of a low power joint for walking robots, by phasic activation of McKibben muscles , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[12]  Yoshinori Watanabe,et al.  Antagonistic muscle-like actuator and its application to multi-d.o.f. forearm prosthesis , 1997, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Design of biped walking robots having antagonistic driven joints using nonlinear spring mechanism , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robot and Systems. Innovative Robotics for Real-World Applications. IROS '97.

[14]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Development and evaluation of seven DOF MIA ARM , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Robert A. Freeman Active Suspension Control via Redundant Actuation , 2004 .

[16]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design and development of a new robot joint using a mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Atsuo Takanishi,et al.  Realization of dynamic biped walking varying joint stiffness using antagonistic driven joints , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[18]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[19]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Development of one-DOF robot arm equipped with mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots.

[20]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Towards grasping in unstructured environments: grasper compliance and configuration optimization , 2005, Adv. Robotics.

[21]  J R Tresilian Retaining the equilibrium point hypothesis as an abstract description of the neuromuscular system. , 1999, Motor control.

[22]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  New robot mechanisms for new robot capabilities , 1991, Proceedings IROS '91:IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems '91.

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Muscle stiffness during transient and continuous movements of cat muscle: perturbation characteristics and physiological relevance , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Donald Russell,et al.  Mechanics and stiffness limitations of a variable stiffness actuator for use in prosthetic limbs , 1999 .

[25]  G.A. Pratt,et al.  Series elastic actuator development for a biomimetic walking robot , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[26]  Joel E. Chestnutt,et al.  An actuator with physically variable stiffness for highly dynamic legged locomotion , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[27]  A. Huxley,et al.  The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Yong Mo Moon,et al.  DESIGN OF LARGE-DISPLACEMENT COMPLIANT JOINTS , 2005 .