The Shapley Axiomatization for Values in Partition Function Games

One of the long-debated issues in coalitional game theory is how to extend the Shapley value to games with externalities (partition-function games). When externalities are present, not only can a player's marginal contribution - a central notion to the Shapley value - be defined in a variety of ways, but it is also not obvious which axiomatization should be used. Consequently, a number of authors extended the Shapley value using complex and often unintuitive axiomatizations. Furthermore, no algorithm to approximate any extension of the Shapley value to partition-function games has been proposed to date. Given this background, we prove in this paper that, for any well-defined measure of marginal contribution, Shapley's original four axioms imply a unique value for games with externalities. As an consequence of this general theorem, we show that values proposed by Macho-Stadler et al., McQuillin and Bolger can be derived from Shapley's axioms. Building upon our analysis of marginal contribution, we develop a general algorithm to approximate extensions of the Shapley value to games with externalities using a Monte Carlo simulation technique.

[1]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Anytime coalition structure generation in multi-agent systems with positive or negative externalities , 2012, Artif. Intell..

[2]  R. Myerson Conference structures and fair allocation rules , 1978 .

[3]  R. Serrano,et al.  Marginal Contributions and Externalities in the Value , 2005 .

[4]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[5]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A logic-based representation for coalitional games with externalities , 2010, AAMAS.

[6]  E. M. Bolger A set of axioms for a value for partition function games , 1989 .

[7]  Ben McQuillin,et al.  The extended and generalized Shapley value: Simultaneous consideration of coalitional externalities and coalitional structure , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A randomized method for the shapley value for the voting game , 2007, AAMAS '07.

[9]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Anytime coalition structure generation: an average case study , 2000, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[10]  H. Young Monotonic solutions of cooperative games , 1985 .

[11]  Isa Emin Hafalir,et al.  Efficiency in coalition games with externalities , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[12]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Anytime coalition structure generation: an average case study , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[13]  A. J. Stam Generation of a Random Partition of a Finite Set by an Urn Model , 1983, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A.

[14]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A coalition formation value for games with externalities , 2011 .

[15]  D. Aldous Exchangeability and related topics , 1985 .

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Potential, value, and consistency , 1989 .

[17]  Guido Schäfer,et al.  Finding Social Optima in Congestion Games with Positive Externalities , 2012, ESA.

[18]  H. Norde,et al.  The Shapley Value for Partition Function Form Games , 2002, IGTR.

[19]  Oskar Skibski Steady Marginality: A Uniform Approach to Shapley Value for Games with Externalities , 2011, SAGT.

[20]  Henk Norde,et al.  The Shapley Value for Partition Function Form Games , 2007, IGTR.

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Computational Aspects of Extending the Shapley Value to Coalitional Games with Externalities , 2010, ECAI.

[22]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Extension of MC-net-based coalition structure generation: handling negative rules and externalities , 2011, AAMAS.

[23]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory , 2011, KES-AMSTA.

[24]  R. Myerson Values of games in partition function form , 1977 .

[25]  Javier Arin,et al.  An Axiom System for a Value for Games in Partition Function Form , 2005, IGTR.

[26]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  Approximating power indices , 2008, AAMAS.

[27]  Bikramjit Banerjee,et al.  Coalition structure generation in multi-agent systems with mixed externalities , 2010, AAMAS.

[28]  W. Lucas,et al.  N‐person games in partition function form , 1963 .

[29]  Daniel Gómez,et al.  Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Cheng-Cheng Hu,et al.  An axiomatic characterization of a value for games in partition function form , 2010 .

[31]  David Wettstein,et al.  Sharing the surplus: An extension of the Shapley value for environments with externalities , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.