Wireless ad hoc sensor and actuator networks on the farm

Agriculture accounts for a significant portion of the GDP in most developed countries. However, managing farms, particularly large-scale extensive farming systems, is hindered by lack of data and increasing shortage of labour. We have deployed a large heterogeneous sensor network on a working farm to explore sensor network applications that can address some of the issues identified above. Our network is solar powered and has been running for over 6 months. The current deployment consists of over 40 moisture sensors that provide soil moisture profiles at varying depths, weight sensors to compute the amount of food and water consumed by animals, electronic tag readers, up to 40 sensors that can be used to track animal movement (consisting of GPS, compass and accelerometers), and 20 sensor/actuators that can be used to apply different stimuli (audio, vibration and mild electric shock) to the animal. The static part of the network is designed for 24/7 operation and is linked to the Internet via a dedicated high-gain radio link, also solar powered. The initial goals of the deployment are to provide a testbed for sensor network research in programmability and data handling while also being a vital tool for scientists to study animal behavior. Our longer term aim is to create a management system that completely transforms the way farms are managed

[1]  Robert Szewczyk,et al.  System architecture directions for networked sensors , 2000, ASPLOS IX.

[2]  Pavan Sikka,et al.  Poster : Understanding interactions between autonomous animal control and temperament when cattle are subjected to virtual fencing applications , 2005 .

[3]  David E. Culler,et al.  The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale , 2004, SenSys '04.

[4]  Wei Hong,et al.  A macroscope in the redwoods , 2005, SenSys '05.

[5]  Margaret Martonosi,et al.  Hardware design experiences in ZebraNet , 2004, SenSys '04.

[6]  Yong Wang,et al.  Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet , 2002, ASPLOS X.

[7]  John Anderson,et al.  An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application , 2004, SenSys '04.

[8]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Wireless sensor devices for animal tracking and control , 2004, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[9]  Calvin Newport,et al.  The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research , 2003 .

[10]  Matt Welsh,et al.  MoteLab: a wireless sensor network testbed , 2005, IPSN '05.

[11]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[12]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Virtual fences for controlling cows , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[13]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Deployment and Connectivity Repair of a Sensor Net with a Flying Robot , 2004, ISER.