Artificial neural networks for characterising Whipple shield performance

Abstract An artificial neural network model has been developed for predicting the perforation limits of spaced aluminium armour (aka Whipple shield) under impact of aluminium projectiles at hypervelocity. The network, utilizing a multilayer perceptron architecture, was trained on data from 769 impact tests, for which it accurately predicted the perforation of the shield rear wall (or lack thereof) 92% of the time. Comparatively, the leading empirical approach was found to accurately predict the outcome of 71% of the impact tests. The network output is an analogue probability of perforation, which is adjusted to a binary “Pass”/”Fail” result via a sigmoid fit that also provides physically plausible confidence bounds (i.e. error bars). Interrogation of the network was performed to identify the input parameters that most heavily correlated with the output prediction. Although the majority of the traditional parameters (i.e. those identified in the empirical ballistic limit equation) were amongst the most influential, some unexpected (and potentially spurious) parameters were also identified. A more widely sampled set of training data incorporating increased diversity in projectile and target materials would likely improve the network internal weighting for material properties and avoid accidental identification of biases in the training exemplars.

[1]  B. G. Cour-Palais,et al.  Meteoroid protection by multiwall structures. , 1969 .

[2]  M. Lambert,et al.  Enhanced Space debris shields for manned spacecraft , 2003 .

[3]  Fred L. Whipple,et al.  Meteorites and space travel. , 1947 .

[4]  Kevin R. Housen,et al.  Whipple Shields Characterized by a Nondimensional Geometry Parameter , 1995 .

[5]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Design and Performance Equations for Advanced Meteoroid and Debris Shields , 1993 .

[6]  Mohamed I. Elmasry,et al.  VLSI Artificial Neural Networks Engineering , 1994 .

[7]  Paul J. Werbos,et al.  The Roots of Backpropagation: From Ordered Derivatives to Neural Networks and Political Forecasting , 1994 .

[8]  Diamantis D. Preonas,et al.  Response of Materials to Impulsive Loading , 1970 .

[9]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Enhanced meteoroid and orbital debris shielding , 1995 .

[10]  Shannon Ryan,et al.  A ballistic limit analysis programme for shielding against micrometeoroids and orbital debris , 2011 .

[11]  H. F. Swift,et al.  BALLISTIC LIMITS OF 6061-T6 ALUMINUM BUMPER SYSTEMS. , 1967 .

[12]  F. Schäfer,et al.  Triple Wall Ballistic Limit Equation , 2005 .

[13]  Duc Truong Pham,et al.  Computational Intelligence: for Engineering and Manufacturing , 2007 .

[14]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Whipple shield performance in the shatter regime , 2011 .

[15]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Penetration equations for thermal protection materials , 1997 .

[16]  Shannon Ryan,et al.  A ballistic limit equation for hypervelocity impacts on composite honeycomb sandwich panel satellite structures , 2008 .

[17]  J. H. Robinson,et al.  Double-Plate Penetration Equations , 2000 .

[18]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Meteoroid/Debris Shielding , 2003 .

[19]  J. W. Gehring,et al.  Experimental investigations of simulated meteoroid damage to various spacecraft structures Summary report , 1965 .

[20]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks and Learning Machines , 2010 .

[21]  William P. Schonberg,et al.  Hypervelocity impact physics , 1991 .

[22]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Performance of Whipple shields at impact velocities above 9 km/s , 2011 .

[23]  Eric L. Christiansen,et al.  Hypervelocity Impact Performance of Open Cell Foam Core Sandwich Panel Structures , 2009 .

[24]  H.-G. Reimerdes,et al.  Modified Cour-Palais/Christiansen damage equations for double-wall structures , 2006 .

[25]  H. F. Swift,et al.  Material Phase Transformation Effects upon Performance of Spaced Bumper Systems , 1972 .